Wednesday, September 4, 2013
APPEAL DENIED
Monday, March 11, 2013
O.M.G. MORE PERSECUTION AND INJUSTICE...
David Murray, (reporter for courier mail) i hope they pay you well for the job you do. I damn you and those like you. who report in this manner. You people dont want the truth, you dont write the truth. All you are interested in is selling newspapers and in the process you dont give a damn about the damage and heartache you cause for such a load of rubbish you print.
When you rang me at my home, (this before the verdict for the sex case) i told you exactly what i thought about how the media operates and why i did not want to talk to you. You have proven my point exactly.
I can just tell you this.... in my daily prayers i thank the Lord for the parents he gave me for i could not have asked for any better.
As for your piece on psychopaths etc...Do you believe that someone who makes up a bunch of lies about something, tries to manipulate friends so as to obtain information from them, comes across as being charming, has to be the center of attention and gain the most popularity at any cost, has aspirations of grandeur and has no signs of remorse or empathy if they hurt someone....would you consider them to be a psychopath? If you do consider them to have psychopathic traits, would you also believe them to be murderers? If you are intelligent, im sure you will get my drift.
Another smear campaign against him just before his appeal is due. But no worries, we will never give up for true justice to take its course.
May you receive what you dish out ten fold Mr Murray. I hope that you dont end up selling your soul for a buck.
Some people will see through all of this and understand the great injustice taking place. Some wont, and some just dont care. The important thing is that we know who Max is and we know he is no MURDERER and no PEDOPHILE.
Friday, March 8, 2013
MAX SICA FOUND NOT GUILTY OF SEX CHARGES
CONVICTED triple murderer Massimo "Max" Sica has been found not guilty of raping and repeatedly abusing a young girl over a four year period.
Sica - who is already serving a record 35-years in jail for the 2003 murder of the Singh siblings - is the latest in a growing list of reviled convicted criminals - including infamous pedophiles Dennis Ferguson and Roy Schloss - to be a acquitted after a rare judge only trial.
Brisbane District Court judge Michael Shanahan delivered the verdict to a stunned packed court - including Sica's parents Carlo and Anna and his siblings - on Friday morning.
Judge Shanahan deliberated almost two weeks before handing down his verdict 21 sex offences - including child rape.
Sica received three life terms of imprisonment - an"d ordered to serve a minimum of 35-years - for the savage murder of the Singh siblings Neelma, 24, Kunal, 18, and Sidhi, 12.
Judge Shanahan, in his written 50-page decision, said medical evidence revealed the girl physically showed all the hallmarks of being a virgin and could not have been subjected to the sexual attack alleged.
"There is one fact ... which causes me significant concern," he said.
"Considering the medical evidence I cannot be satisfied beyond a seasonable doubt that the penetrative (sexual) acts occurred as described by the (girl)."
Judge Shanahan also commented on the girl's "credibility", saying her evidence raised a "number of issues of concern."
"I am not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that any of the counts have been proved ... (and) verdicts of not guilty are entered to each of the counts."
Sica, who stood ramrod straight in the dock of Court 31 for the verdict, breathed out deeply and smiled as he heard Judge Shanahan's decision.
Outside court, Sica's jubilant brother, Claudio, said: "Justice has finally been served, but not fully."
"There was no other verdict that could have been given."
Sica has become the latest in a growing long line of infamous criminals to win judge only trials - including notorious pedophiles Dennis Ferguson and Roy Schloss.
Sica was granted the judge-only trial after his lawyers convinced the court Sica's notoriety would make it almost impossible to find and impartial panel of jurors anywhere in Queensland.
Sica early last month pleaded not guilty to 21 sex offences, including two counts of rape and one of maintaining a sexual relationship with the child between November 15, 2004 and September 10, 2008.
Then aged 35 to 39, he was also charged with nine counts each of unlawful carnal knowledge and indecent dealing of a child under 16.
The court had been told Sica allegedly had sex with the child, then aged between nine and 13, more than 100 times during the four-year period.
In July, a Brisbane Supreme Court jury found Sica guilty of the 2003 murder of the Singh siblings.
He was sentenced to three life terms, with a record minimum non-parole period of 35-years.
Sica has appealed those verdicts, with a two day hearing scheduled to start in the Court of Appeal in Brisbane on May 27.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sica has become the latest in a growing long line of infamous criminals to win judge only trials - including notorious pedophiles Dennis Ferguson and Roy Schloss
The above statement that some reporter by the name of Tony Keim added to his article really disgusts me. Mr Keim, i suggest you research all the facts surrounding this case before you have the gall to print such crap. This is exactly what i mean by persecution and misguided justice.
Max Sica was found NOT GUILTY because the facts speak for themselves. The girl in question was found to be a virgin with no trauma to her hymen whatsoever. She continued adding new allegations even when this trial was underway. In statements made to police, when she could not recall something she would say she blacked out. She blacked out more than 60 times in her statements.
When she was questioned by police at the very beginning of this whole thing, she had said she had made it up because she wanted to manipulate a friend of hers into telling her about her sexual molestation by her step father. Then when Det. Zitny (lead detective of the singh murders investigation) got involved in the sex charge case and started asking her questions, she started making all these allegations and continued to add more allegations years after the fact. She stated that she had full on sexual penetration for four yrs and at least over one hundred times, she could not recall dates, times, places etc because how could she......she made it all up and therefore could not risk inventing dates when she did not know where Max was on that specific date.
ALSO take into consideration that Max Sica was monitored by police in every which way for years leading up to his arrest for the murders. House was bugged, GPS tracking of his cars, phones tapped, undercover police following him and video surveillance put on him. You could even hear the toilet flush on some of the tapes made in his home. Those police officers were questioned as to whether they heard or saw any of this taking place. Their answer was NO.
Max was arrested five years after he discovered the bodies of the Singh children. Nothing had changed, no new evidence, no smoking gun, no miracle witness. BUT there was the sexual allegations which caused a deliberate smear campaign against him. Again a media circus, assassination of character, all headlines no facts. Only two months after he was charged with these allegations he was then charged and later convicted for the Singh murders. Police saw their window of opportunity and took it.
Max Sica was found NOT GUILTY today and yet the media seem to put it like this....
Max Sica found not guilty but only because of a judge only trial and medical reports which cannot prove intercourse took place. ARE WE FOR REAL?
If his name was not Max Sica, if the police didnt want to desperately pin the Singh murders on him, this alleged sexual misconduct case would have never made it into a court of law with the facts they already had obtained.
Wake up and smell the roses, you could be the next VICTIM of this so called JUSTICE SYSTEM.
We will now concentrate on the appeal for the murder case. Where only the bloodied ear and partial face print found at the murder scene (which DID NOT belong to Max or the Singhs) was plenty for reasonable doubt.
Saturday, February 23, 2013
VERDICT FOR SEX CASE SOMETIME NEXT WEEK
Verdict for this case will be given sometime next week. I only hope and pray that it will be NOT GUILTY. Remember the girl accuses him of having had sex with her for four yrs from the ages of 9 till 13. She says she has had full on sex with him at least over one hundred times. She also says she cannot remember a lot of things or has blacked out on many occasions when she cant recall stuff. This girl at the age of 13 was given a medical examination and was not only found to have her hymen intact, but was found to have no trauma to her hymen either. She has added new allegations even as this trial was under way. When she was first questioned over these allegations she had made to her friends at school, she told police she had made them up because she wanted to know more about one of her friends who was making allegations of her own towards her stepfather. She later stared saying her allegations were true and added new allegations throughout. Maxs home was bugged for a number of years when these allegations were made against him. Not once was it picked up on any bugging device placed in the home that these allegations were taking place. GPS tracking of his vehicle and police monitoring and following him were also placed on him during most of these allegations. (You can be very consistent in telling anything you want to tell when youve had yrs of practice at it. when you read the news article above, you will understand the consistent thing)
Saturday, November 24, 2012
Max Sica child sex trial delayed until early 2013 to hear new evidence from alleged victim
MAX Sica's child sex trial may not re-commence until February after it was adjourned in order to hear new evidence from a 17-year-old girl who allegedly had a sexual relationship with the convicted killer that started when she was nine.
Brisbane District Court Judge Michael Shanahan adjourned the trial Thursday morning and ordered Sica's alleged victim be recalled to give further evidence to the court during a preliminary hearing, which is yet to be listed.
It came after the court heard new evidence tendered in the child's Victim Impact Statement that represented a "substantial change in the allegations" that had already been explored in her interviews with police and during earlier cross-examination.
"It seems to me the child, having given evidence in the normal way before a jury, as a result of the victim impact statement, she would be recalled to be further cross-examined in relation to the new allegation," Judge Shanahan said.
"It seems to me in these circumstances where the information disclosed in that paragraph of the victim impact statement as it's an allegation of a different nature to what the complainant spoke about in extensive police interviews and in earlier cross examinations.
"It's in the interests of justice to allow the accused to cross-examine those allegations."
Sica, 42, has pleaded not guilty to 21 sex offences, including two counts of rape and one of maintaining a sexual relationship with a child between November 15, 2004 and September 10, 2008.
Then aged 35 to 39, he was also charged with nine counts each of unlawful carnal knowledge and indecent dealing of a child under 16.
Sica's alleged sexual relationship with the girl lasted from when she was nine until she was 13.
Judge Shanahan tentatively set aside two weeks from February 4, 2013, when the trial could recommence.
Earlier this week the court was told the girl, then aged 9, and her mother, moved in to Sica's home at Stafford with his parents and girlfriend in late 2004.
It heard the girl would spend time alone in the house with Sica while his girlfriend and the child's mother worked shifts at the family's pizza outlets.
The alleged relationship was revealed when the girl told school friends she was in love with an older man with whom she was having sex.
In July, a Brisbane Supreme Court jury found Sica guilty of the 2003 murder of the Singh siblings Neelma, 24, Kunal, 18, and Sidhi, 12.
http://max-sica.blogspot.com.au/2010/04/common-sense.html
http://max-sica.blogspot.com.au/2010/04/alleged-sex-offence-charges.html
Please do click on the links and read ALL the facts.
In my opinion, if this mans name was not Max Sica, this case would have never made it to a court of law. Remember that all these allegations led Max Sica to be charged with sexual abuse of a minor.
Bail had been granted to him for this case.
In the mean time, he once more had a total character assassination by media regarding the charges. Two months after he was granted bail for these allegations, he was charged and arrested for the Singh murders.
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Max Sica's sex case adjourned as court questions discrepancies in interview transcript
THE child sex trial of convicted triple murderer Max Sica has ground to halt again, this time so lawyers can fact-check a written transcript of a police interview with his alleged victim.
Brisbane District Court Judge Michael Shanahan adjourned the trial until Tuesday to allow prosecutor Todd Fuller SC to check the transcripts.
It came after the court spent more than an hour rewinding sections of the police interview because the words being said during the interview did not match what had been written in the transcripts.
``If this is going to keep happening, I'm going to stop the trial and the transcripts can be prepared properly,'' Judge Shanahan warned before lunch, when the interview had already run for 54 minutes.
But when the trial resumed at 2.30pm, Mr Fuller conceded a new transcript had to be prepared in the case of the child's second interview with police.
He said a staff member had been reviewing the interview for the past two hours in the hope of having a transcript ready this afternoon.
``It must have been at some stage saved incorrectly, that's all I can say,'' Mr Fuller said.
Judge Shanahan said it should have been done earlier.
He said there was a ''dramatic'' difference between what could be seen on the transcript and what could be heard on the interview and pointed to whole sections of the tape which had been left out.
Barrister Sam Di Carlo, for Sica, said he would need time to review the new transcripts before the trial recommenced.
He also suggested the second interview be re-watched from the beginning with the correct transcript.
Judge Shanahan adjourned the hearing until 10am Tuesday.
It's the second false start for Sica's child sex trial, which was initially scheduled to begin on Monday a week ago.
The trial had to be adjourned for several days in order to give the defence more time to respond to a controversial medical report which had been tendered by the prosecution.
Sica, 42, has pleaded not guilty to 21 sex offences, including two counts of rape and one of maintaining a sexual relationship with a child between November 15, 2004, and September 10, 2008.
He has also been charged with nine counts of unlawful carnal knowledge and indecent dealing of a child under 16.
Judge Shanahan was told Sica's alleged sexual relationship with the girl lasted from when she was nine until she was 13.
Earlier today, the court heard recorded police interviews with the girl, who gave a slow and often painful account of what happened between them.
''It happened a lot of times... him having sex with me,'' she said.
The court heard the girl, then aged 9, and her mother moved in to Max Sica's home at Stafford with his parents and girlfriend in late 2004.
It heard the girl would spend time alone in the house with Sica while his girlfriend and the child's mother worked shifts at the family's pizza outlets.
The child told police how she had been ''mucking around'' with Sica on his bed when the relationship first started.
''He told me to put my legs around his neck,'' the girl, who was around five months away from turning 10 at the time, told police during the interview in September, 2008.
She said Sica had tried to remove her pyjama pants with his teeth.
The girl told police about a second encounter with Sica two weeks later.
Last week it was revealed Sica's alleged nine-year-old victim started documenting the intimate sexual relationship with him in coded-diary entries.
Prosecutor Todd Fuller, SC, said the alleged relationship was revealed when the girl told school friends she was in love with an older man with whom she was having sex.
In July, a Brisbane Supreme Court jury found Sica guilty of the 2003 murder of the Singh siblings Neelma, 24, Kunal, 18, and Sidhi, 12.
He received a non-parole 35-year jail term.
http://max-sica.blogspot.com.au/2010/04/common-sense.html
http://max-sica.blogspot.com.au/2010/04/alleged-sex-offence-charges.html
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
DIAL $50,000 FOR MURDER TALE
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
NOT THE END
Thursday, June 28, 2012
WE ARE WITH YOU
Monday, June 25, 2012
The edited list Mr Di Carlo gave the jury:
10. ''You could not be satisfied there was a full and proper investigation.
9. You could not be satisfied there was a proper and full investigation into Fiji [where the Singhs' parents were on holiday at the time of the
8. There are [finger]prints outstanding at the Singh house that are identifiable but to date have not been identified. There is always the chance that sometime down the track they may be identified.
7. The unexplained but dismissed as distractions of the blood-stained sandal in Neelma's room, the cup, the t-shirt and the blue bucket.
6. In the five years and eight months, Sica did not run away and despite the deployment of undercover police, listening devices and tracking devices, they were not able to produce one iota of direct evidence.
5. The failure to delete from Neelma's phone the 8.56 message "See you later, coming down with something."
4. The compete lack of any evidence of a violent disposition on Max's part, despite an abundance of provocative incidents.
3. No one person could engage in such blood letting, carried bodies to a spa, carried blankets and bed linen to a spa and then so thoroughly clean a house of that magnitude that every single trace of his presence and involvement in the murder is erased in the window the Crown contends.
2. The investigation has failed to identify who was at the door around 8.30pm on Easter Sunday and why was it necessary for Neelma to cut her conversation with her sister to answer the door when Kunal and Sidhi were home. Ask yourself who used this cup that they didn't get the DNA from in Neelma's room.
1. Reasons you couldn't be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused: Not one iota of the victims' DNA, blood, or other bodily fluids or bleach etcetera was detected on Max Sica, his clothes, his cars and not one iota of Max Sica's DNA, blood, other bodily fluids, hair etcetera was detected at the crime scene and I ask you to compare that with the minuscule amount they found in respect to Johnson and Daffy [two identified DNA samples in the house] which had been left some considerable period of time before on one small square of carpet.''
Saturday, June 23, 2012
To all concerned
.Firstly, Max Sica asked for an judge only trial (due to all the media hype concerning this case,) then he requested the trial be heard in another state where it would be fairer (as most other states allow the defence to call witnesses and enter evidence, and where the media coverage was not all one sided). These requests were denied.
Now after the state has spent $23 million on this circus; the judge wants to give a massive summing up to the jury. ARE THEY FOR REAL? WHAT A JOKE! NO WONDER THEY GET CONVICTIONS WRONG SO MANY TIMES .
POINTS TO CONSIDER
· THE PAINTER (WHICH THE DPP DID NOT CALL TO THE STAND) WAS 110% SURE OF SEEING THE LITTLE GIRL COME OUT TO GET HER DOG MONDAY MORNING. NOTED IN WORK DIARY.
· THE GIRL WHO WENT TO KNOCK ON THE DOOR AND HEARD LOUD MUSIC ON MONDAY AFTERNOON, NO ONE CAME TO DOOR BUT THE MUSIC WAS TURNED OFF.
· THE NEIGBOURS (9 IN TOTAL) THAT HEARD THE BLOOD GURLDING SCREAMS ON THE MONDAY NIGHT JUST AFTER MIDNIGHT COMING FROM THE SINGH HOUSE, AGAIN THE DPP DID NOT CALL THEM TO THE STAND.
· THE POLICE PSYCHIC THAT TOLD POLICE MAX DID NOT DO IT AND THAT IT WAS TWO GUYS; A SMALL ASIAN GUY AND A BIG TALL INDONESIAN LOOKING MAN, AND GUESS WHAT? AT THE CRIME SCENE THEY FOUND A XXXL WHITE T-SHIRT AND SIZE 8 SANDLES WITH BLOOD ON THEM, WHY DID THEY NOT CALL HER TO THE STAND?
· THE FACT THE FATHER HAD SEX WITH A YOUNG GIRL, THEN BRIBED THE FAMILY WITH $500 AND A FEW GIFTS.
· THE FACT THAT ONLY THE 3 CHILDREN THAT MR SINGH WAS HAVING PROBLEMS WITH WERE KILLED AND NOT HIS FAVOURED CHILD. AT THE MOST CONVENIENT TIME WHEN THE POLICE WERE LOOKING INTO HIM MOLESTING HIS YOUNGEST, AND IT WAS ON TAPE THAT HE SAYS TO HIS WIFE “YOU KNOW I LIKE IT.”.
· THE LADY THAT SAW TWO MEN APPROX 5AM TUESDAY, JUMP THE FENCE BEHIND THE SINGH HOUSE. WHY NOT CALL HER TO THE STAND?
· THE FACT THAT MR SINGH SAYS TO MAX (AND ITS RECORDED BY HIMSELF) “YOU WAIT, YOU WILL GO THROUGH YOUR WORST NIGHTMARE SOON AND REMEMBER IT WAS ME AND I WILL BE LOOKING DOWN AND LAUGHING”, ”YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT IS COMING AND WHAT I AM CAPABLE OF” CHILLING WHEN YOU CONSIDER THEIR CULTURE KILLS THEIR OWN CHILDREN FOR SILLY REASONS ALL THE TIME AND HE TELLS THEM THEY ARE DEAD TO HIM.
THERE ARE MANY MORE WITNESSES THEY COULD HAVE CALLED BUT DID NOT. (SO AS NOT TO SHOW THE TRUE CASE; ) THE FACT MR SINGH WAS UNDER FEDRAL POLICE INVESTIGATION..... I HAVE BEEN MADE AWARE THEY WILL CONTINUE WITH THIS INVESTIGATION AFTER THE CASE WITH MAX IS DEALT WITH (HOW UNFAIR).
The following statements i must advise for legal reasons are all alleged and some like the end scenario is an intelligent thought plausable account of what may have been the sorry last days,for the Singh children.
You may recall mr singh was bashed in another home invasion a few years prior,just too many questions when it comes to this dispicable person
· THE ''ALLEGATIONS'' THAT THE FATHER (MR SINGH) STOLE A DRUM OF DRUGS FROM HIS BUSINESS DEALING WITH ASIAN GANGS AND LIED THAT IT NEVER ARRIVED IN HIS SPARE PARTS CONTAINER THAT CAME FROM INDONESIA. IT WAS NOTED THE VALUE OF THESE DRUGS WERE $350,000 TO $400,000 THIS WAS FURTHER CONFIRMED BY A FINANCIAL ADVISOR WHO WAS INVITED TO THE SINGH HOUSE AND ASKED HOW MR SINGH COULD CLEAN AND UTILISE SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS OF CASH. THIS MAN DISAPPEARED AND HAS NEVER BEEN FOUND.
IT IS OUR BELIEF THAT THE KILLERS ENTERED THE HOUSE SUNDAY NIGHT; MADE THE CHILDREN SEND OUT SMS MESSAGES TO THEIR FRIENDS TO NOT COME OVER, THEN KEPT THE CHILDREN ALIVE NOT WANTING TO KILL THEM, TRYING TO GET MR SINGH TO PAY BACK THE MONEY HE SOLD THEIR DRUGS FOR. WHEN MR SINGH DID NOT RESPOND OR REFUSE TO GIVE THEM THEIR MONEY BACK, THEY KILLED THEM THEN CLEANED UP AND LEFT TUESDAY MORNING.
ANOTHER KEY FACT IS MR SINGH HAD TO SELL A PROPERTY OVERSEAS AND THE MONEY WAS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR; SO HE PAID THE KILLERS BACK ONLY AFTER THEY KILLED HIS 3 CHILDREN AND THREATENED TO KILL HIM OR HIS OTHER CHILDREN TOO. WHAT MAN WOULD LEAVE HIS CHILDREN TO FACE THE MESS HE CAUSED?
THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES