MAKES YOU THINK......

These are witness statements from 2 workers who were working together at the house beside the Singh home.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr Hurley`s statement:

Renderer Troy Edmond Hurley told the court he was working at a house next to the Singh's home on April 22, 2003, when he saw a car pull up and a man get out and spend "10 to 15 minutes" around the front of the house.

At that time he had not seen any children with the man but he had only glanced over his shoulder.

Mr Hurley said he later saw the man with two children, a boy and a girl, on the driveway and they went around the side of the house. The man had tried two doors at the back of the house.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr Moore`s statement:

Mr Di Carlo asked Mr Moore if he saw the man and the children knock on the front door and then walk up the back of the garage and look around.

"No, the man went up the driveway and to the back of the house," Mr Moore said.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

These two men were working at the same house on that day, each man has a different version of what they saw and heard on the day. Which version do you think the police were more in favour of?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Witness statements from people who lived close to the Singh house at the time of their deaths.

She told the court she had been away for the Easter weekend and returned home at about lunchtime on the Monday.

In the afternoon she had a barbecue for some friends and about 7.30 or 8.30 they heard what sounded like two gunshots or two cracks of a whip.

"Did you also hear a blood curdling scream?" Mr Di Carlo asked.

Ms Bliss replied that she had and it seemed to be a female.

She told Mr Di Carlo she had not called police but later spoke with them after an unusual incident while she was walking with a friend.

Ms Bliss said she was walking on a bike path at about 5.30am when she saw a man dressed in work clothes.

The man looked at them and ran off before jumping a fence.

Ms Bliss told Mr Di Carlo she was shown a photo board but had not recognised anyone and had also helped police with a comfit photograph.

Julie Anne Hicks and her then boyfriend Gary Paul Ball went to a barbecue at Ms Bliss and her husband Jeffrey Bliss's home at Grey Gum Close.

Ms Hicks said it had been very quiet and dark and she assumed most people were still away for Easter.

She told Mr Di Carlo she heard what she thought was a whip crack but after talking with the others they decided it was a gunshot.

Ms Hicks said she also recalled hearing a loud scream.

"I have described it as blood curdling. It made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I thought it was female and it seemed to go on for about 10 seconds," she added.

Ms Hicks told Mr Di Carlo that at the time it had terrified her and she had expected to hear sirens but she didn't.

"We didn't know where it came from ......we had no sense of direction," she said.

Ms Hicks said she could put the time as being dark but before 8.30pm when she had gone inside to watch a television show.

Mr Ball told Mr Di Carlo he went to the Hendra police station the next day because he had concerns about some noises he heard.

He said between 8pm and 8.30pm he heard two to three short sharp shots.

"In between (the shots) I heard a scream......I had no idea where it came from," he said.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Alicia Gwyneth Frances was the fourth witness to tell of hearing a scream in the area of the Singh family home on the night of April 21-22, 2003, but she placed it at a later time than evidence given by three others.

The court has heard police believe Neelma Singh, 24, Kunal Singh, 18, and Sidhi Singh, 12, were murdered at their Bridgeman Downs, in Brisbane's north, late on April 20 or early on April 21, 2003.

The Crown today called Mrs Frances for cross examination by barrister Sam Di Carlo, for Sica, on what she heard early on Tuesday, April 22, 2003.

Mrs Frances told the court she was asleep in her home in Knightsbridge Place, Bridgeman Down, which had a view of the Singhs' home in Grass Tree Close.

She told Mr Di Carlo she remembered being awoken by a screaming sound she believed was coming from the direction of Grass Tree Close.

"I opened my eyes and woke up....I physically got up and to look at the alarm clock," Mrs Frances said, explaining the clock was on her husband's side of the bed.

She said it was either 12.20 or 12.28 because she was not wearing her glasses and had trouble telling the difference between the "8" and the "0".

"So there was no guessing about the time," Mr Di Carlo said.

"Absolutely no," Mrs Frances replied.

Mr Di Carlo asked Mrs Frances if what she had heard could be described as "guttural".

"I believe I heard a scream. I thought it was blood curdling.......I felt it was a female," Mrs Frances said.

She said she went to the back of her house and stood there for 10 to 15 minutes while her husband had gone downstairs to check.

In re-examination, prosecutor Brendan Campbell asked if while she was standing in the backroom Mrs Frances heard anything else.

She said the initial noise sounded like it was carried on the wind but she also heard some other noise near the house.

Mr Campbell also asked how she was certain what day she heard the noises.

"I am going on what I said to police at that initial time. I am using that information and I know it happened at that time, it was Easter, it was that period of time," she replied.

The court had earlier heard evidence from three witnesses who were at a barbecue in a house near Grass Tree Close on April 21 and they heard a scream at about 8.30 that night

Paramedics, Peter Billin and Ryan Reddy told the court they were called to Grass Tree Close where they had been told there were three bodies.

Mr Billin told the court he could see a woman and a younger girl in the spa and he had tried to find any signs of life in either body.

He said he could find no signs of life and both had signs of rigor mortis.

Mr Reddy said he saw two bodies in the bath and another apparently submerged except for a foot protruding.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Above you can read that Mr Reddy saw the foot of a third body in the spa bath when he arrived at the scene of the crime that day. Below is the statement of Officer Green and what HE SAID, HE SAW, when he arrived at the scene of the crime that day

Senior Constable Green said he saw only two bodies submerged in the murky water of the spa, which had been left running, upon first walking into the ensuite.

He said there was bedding dumped on the bathroom floor, which was wet where the spa had overflowed.

Some of the bedding had been placed in the spa with the bodies and at least two black pillows were partially submerged in the water, he said.

Senior Constable Green said he discovered the third body - being Kunal's - in the water only after returning to the ensuite a second time and moving a black pillow resting on the edge of the spa and then "leaning right over" the foot of the bath.

"At that stage I could see past the female body and see another set of legs wedged under her," he said.

Senior Constable Green said he could not see a male foot protruding from the spa, or a male knee visible beneath the water, upon his initial observation of the scene.

"I remember them being wedged further down," he said.

But he conceded parts of the third body were visible at the time after being shown crime scene photographs when cross-examined by Mr Sica's defence barrister Sam Di Carlo.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I am not trying to prove anything here, but sometimes it just boggles the mind how there can be different versions by different people of the same event.

Like i have stated before on this blog, the police only alledge that the crimes were committed late Sunday very early Monday because Max Sica was in his bed sleeping at that time, thus to them he had no tangiable alibi.

The coroner cannot establish time of death because of factors involved in the crime itself. He cannot really even establish the exact murder weapons used to kill them for there was more than one.

Think about it yourselves and truly see what all the evidence and facts are truly saying about this case.

Max Sica murder trial twist as witness tells of 'scream' and 'gunshots' day after Singh siblings were killed

THE Singh murder trial took a twist with witnesses telling they heard a "blood curdling scream" and what appeared to be gun shots in the neigbourhood a day after police allege the siblings were murdered.

Kim Maree Bliss was called for cross examination by barrister Sam Di Carlo, for accused killer Max Sica, about events on the night of Monday April 21 and Tuesday April 22, 2003.

The trial has heard police allege the Singh siblings were murdered late on April 20 or early in the morning on April 21, 2003.

Sica, 42, has pleaded not guilty murdering Neelma Singh, 24, Kunal Singh, 18, and Sidhi Singh, 12, at Bridgeman Downs, in Brisbane's north.

Ms Bliss said in 2003 she was living at Grey Gum Close at Bridgeman Downs which was near where the Singh's home in Grass Tree Close.

She told the court she had been away for the Easter weekend and returned home at about lunchtime on the Monday.

In the afternoon she had a barbecue for some friends and about 7.30 or 8.30 they heard what sounded like two gunshots or two cracks of a whip.

"Did you also hear a blood curdling scream?" Mr Di Carlo asked.

Ms Bliss replied that she had and it seemed to be a female.

She told Mr Di Carlo she had not called police but later spoke with them after an unusual incident while she was walking with a friend.

Ms Bliss said she was walking on a bike path at about 5.30am when she saw a man dressed in work clothes.

The man looked at them and ran off before jumping a fence.

Ms Bliss told Mr Di Carlo she was shown a photo board but had not recognised anyone and had also helped police with a comfit photograph.

Julie Anne Hicks and her then boyfriend Gary Paul Ball went to a barbecue at Ms Bliss and her husband Jeffrey Bliss's home at Grey Gum Close.

Ms Hicks said it had been very quiet and dark and she assumed most people were still away for Easter.

She told Mr Di Carlo she heard what she thought was a whip crack but after talking with the others they decided it was a gunshot.

Ms Hicks said she also recalled hearing a loud scream.

"I have described it as blood curdling. It made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I thought it was female and it seemed to go on for about 10 seconds," she added.

Ms Hicks told Mr Di Carlo that at the time it had terrified her and she had expected to hear sirens but she didn't.

"We didn't know where it came from ......we had no sense of direction," she said.

Ms Hicks said she could put the time as being dark but before 8.30pm when she had gone inside to watch a television show.

Mr Ball told Mr Di Carlo he went to the Hendra police station the next day because he had concerns about some noises he heard.

He said between 8pm and 8.30pm he heard two to three short sharp shots.

"In between (the shots) I heard a scream......I had no idea where it came from," he said.

Mr Ball told Mr Di Carlo he had never told police he saw someone running from the Singh house.

Phillipa Jade Danrel, a recruitment officer, said she remembered Neelma Singh had applied for a job at travel company Flight Centre.

Neelma attended a trial but the position from that store was withdrawn and she was "put on ice" for another trial with another store.

Ms Danrell said Neelma was finally approved for a job and was to come in for an interview on April 22 but she had no more contact with her.

The trial before Justice John Byrne continues.

==========================================================

Police only theorize that the Singh children were killed late Sunday night or very early Monday morning, not because they know this for a fact, but because it was the only tine Max Sica was asleep in his bed. Even though his brother and mother told police he was home in bed, to them it is only their word.

Max Sica went to pick up his kids on the Monday morning at around 7am. Police know that the last phone contact between Max Sica and Neelma Singh (from Sica home land line to Singh home land line) was at about 11.10pm on the Easter Sunday night. Persons who were at the Sica house (not family related persons) on that Easter Sunday night saw Max at home before they left.

Police are saying that Max Sica sometime during the Easter Sunday night early into the Easter Monday morning, snuck out of the house without anyone seeing him. That he then went to the Singh house, had some sort of confrontation and decided to brutally torture and murder the Singh siblings. According to police he then attempted to clean up some area downstairs where the murders did not take place for they were all found in a spa bath in an upstairs bathroom. The spa bath was covered with all the bed sheets and Duna`s from the beds. He then had to clean himself up really well for he would have been covered in blood etc. They then had to theorize that he went back to his home, pretended to be getting out of bed and getting ready to go pick up his kids at his ex wife`s house . All this in a few short hours.

These witnesses that have said they heard screaming, shots or whip cracks are already of a concern. There was also another witness in the committal phase of this trial who stated that on the Easter Monday morning he saw a young girl come out the front door of the Singh house, she had taken a small dog inside the house. When he saw footage of the Singh children, he recognized her to be Sidhi Singh. Police had told this witness that he must have been mistaken (for this did not suit them and their beliefs of events) but this witness was adamant about what he saw and stated it at committal.

The man who was seen at around 5.30am on the day the Singh children were discovered dead by Max Sica. Who was this man? Why has he not come forward? Why did he run up a hill and jump a fence when he saw these two women had seen him? Why did the police not ever mention this incident? and lastly, why was the comfit sketch of this man never aired on the media? I would think it would be of great importance trying to find out who this person was and what they were doing there on that particular day and time of day.

There is another witness who at committal stated she heard a bone chilling scream at around midnight or shortly after on Tuesday the 22nd April 2003. She said that it lasted for three to four minutes and that it terrified her. She said it sounded like a young woman. This witness lived close to the Singh residence at the time. Unfortunately the police were not called. I believe the Singh children were being tortured and in the end whoever did this, decided to brutally kill them.

The threats Mr Singh recieved from two men in Fiji on two of his land lines at his home are truly chilling. They told him that they would rape and kill his wife and daughters. This shortly before the Singh children were found dead. Mr Singhs wife was with him in Fiji when the children were killed.

Max Sica was the prime suspect for the police, not a year later, but the very same day he discovered the bodies. He was it and there was no turning back. Max Sica was hounded by not only police, but by media from the very beginning. Even though he was not charged with the crime until the end of December 2008, he was continually in the media headlines since the day he walked into the Singh home and discovered what must have been the most shocking thing he ever witnessed. He has had trial by media from day one and a total assassination of character. The laws against this should really be put in place for i find it extremely prejudice and unjust.

Max Sica fully co operated with police from day one. He gave them everything they asked for without the need of a search warrant or the presence of a lawyer. BIG MISTAKE i have learnt how the justice system works or doesnt work. Believe me, in any similar circumstance, do make sure that YOU DO have a LAWYER present, you would at least know what your rights are and how the law truly operates.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/police-say-vijay-singh-contacted-them-before-murder-fearing-for-daughters-safety-after-break-up-with-max-sica/story-e6freoof-1226293473177

section in this media article also states what Mrs Singh continually denied in court, that is, her husband V.J. Singhs sexual molestation of his daughters. Kunal Singhs then girlfriend confirms what Max had said about Mrs Singh having said this while he and Katrina were present.

Ms McIlroy said she also recalled a conversation with Shirley Singh and Neelma Singh in which allegations that Vijay Singh molested his daughters were discussed.

She confirmed Sica was present but he had said nothing while she was there.

Vijay Singh 'woke screaming' from nightmare in Fiji around the time that his children were murdered in Australia

THE father of the murdered Singh siblings had a "horrible dream" on the night they were allegedly killed, a court heard today.

Vijay Singh was in Fiji on April 20, 2003, when he had a dream which resulted in both he and his wife Shirley waking up screaming in the middle of the night .

The Supreme Court in Brisbane has heard that police believed the Singh siblings were killed late on April 20 or early on April 21, 2003.

During cross examination, Vijay Singh told defence barrister Sam Di Carlo that the nightmare had not been about his slain children.

He agreed it had been about a woman in black but he and Shirley had comforted each other after he woke up screaming.

Vijay Singh told police about the dream in his statement.

Max Sica, 41, had pleaded not guilty to murdering Neelma Singh, 24, Kunal Singh, 18, and Sidhi Singh, 12, at Bridgeman Downs, in Brisbane's north, on April 21, 2003.

The court had heard Vijay Singh and Shirley Singh were on business in Fiji from April 13, 2003.

Mr Di Carlo, for Sica, asked Vijay Singh at length about calls made from Fiji to the Bridgeman Downs house from mid-April while they were on business.

"On Easter Sunday (April 20) or Easter Monday (April 21) according to records there were no calls from you (Vijay) or Shirley in Fiji to the Bridgeman Downs house or from the house to Fiji.

"Why would you go two days without calling the children at all?" Mr Di Carlo asked.

Vijay Singh said on the Monday he sent money via Western Union and tried to send a fax with details to the house but it had not gone through.

He said he had no recollection of trying to make a call on those days but he could not answer for his wife.

VIjay Singh told the court when he returned from Fiji after the killings he had been taken to a police station but he could not recall if he spoke to them about Sica.

He could not recall police telling him Sica was the prime suspect.

Earlier, Vijay Singh agreed with Mr Di Carlo that with the passage of time he could become confused about some issues.

Vijay Singh had apologised to the court about giving evidence on an incident on Mothers Day when he believed Sica arrived when he was making breakfast.

But Vijay said on reflection he had his Mothers Days confused and he had not been in the country on that day. Shirley had told him of the incident.

"You were honestly mistaken, you had convinced yourself it was true and you weren't trying to be dishonest. With a passage of time you got confused?" Mr Di Carlo asked.

Vijay Singh agreed that he could have been confused about other some things but not everything.

The start of the trial, before Justice John Byrne, was delayed about 30 minutes today when a juror was caught in Brisbane's traffic chaos.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr Singh says he had a horrible nightmare and woke up screaming on Easter Sunday 2003, he said it was not directly related to his slain children but that he saw a woman in black..... he says he and his wife comforted each other etc....in other words it was like a bad omen of some sort. Mr Singh did not ring his children or hear from them at all on that Easter Sunday. He says that on the Easter Monday he tried to fax a code at the house in Australia to Neelma so she could go get the money he sent. He says he tried to ring Neelma but got no reply. He had this horrible nightmare, a bad omen, if it was me i would want to speak with my children, not because he had special powers and knew his children were in mortal danger, but because in my opinion, being Easter day and all, i would want to wish them a Happy Easter and see if all was ok. Of course this is in MY OPINION. Everyone is different and chooses to act the way they wish.

Mr Singh was 100% sure about the Mothers day incident he had stated in court the other day, he said it and repeated it. When defence lawyer S Di Carlo told him that he would have been out of the country according to his own passport details, he was still going on about how sure he was and said that passport documentation etc is only a bunch of paperwork etc etc..... i see today he has acknowledged that he was wrong about the incident.

Mr Singh states that he can not recall speaking to police about Max Sica when he arrived in Australia and was taken to a police station.... believe me, thats all that Mr Singh did do. He started doing it even before he left the country in March when he took his daughter Neelma along with him to the Stafford Police Station to make a complaint against Max...He was so worried, he was so concerned, he thought Max was such a psycho that he left the country with his wife shortly after and left the children on their own.

Mr Singh recieved threatening calls to his home from Fiji not long before the deaths of his children. At first he says that he did not really find them that threatening, he thought it was someone in Fiji made to make these calls on behalf of his wife or mistress etc.... The call found on his answering machine was truly threatening and vile and vicious in nature. words to the effect of...you fucked with our family, now we are gonna fuck with yours. Rape your wife and daughters, we know where you live, we now have your phone number. Then in their native language they say die and kill. Mr Singh had made a note of this call on a diary page. He says the call was made on Oct 30th 2002 at 946pm, another call was made about ten minutes later where he says he actually had a conversation with these people but the tape got erased when his business case was broken into. Phone records do not show he had recieved these two calls on that particular day and at those particular times from overseas numbers. I guess he must have confused the date and times for those calls as well. He did say he had asked his wife when she came back from Fiji with Neelma if she had done this and that she had said no.

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/father-of-murdered-kids-haunted-by-dream-20120228-1u0da.html

link above includes .....

Mrs Singh took the stand on Tuesday afternoon, providing details about how her family met the Sica family after they first moved to Brisbane in 1993.

She became teary when speaking about her children, and said she had eventually become concerned about Neelma becoming too friendly with Sica.

‘‘She said: ‘No, we’re just friends mum. He’s just trying to help us out’,’’ she said.

However, Mrs Singh said Neelma quit her job in Dubai in 2002 and returned to Brisbane without telling her family so that she could secretly live with Sica.

However, she said her daughter soon told her she had changed her mind because she thought Sica was ‘‘possessive’’.

‘‘She said she was glad she lived in Bribie Island with him because she actually got to know what sort of person he was,’’ Mrs Singh said.

‘‘She said she doesn’t want to have anything to do with him any more.

‘‘She said she doesn’t like Max any more at all.’’

Mrs Singh said she told Sica not to visit their home any more.

The trial continues.

Mrs Singh is now being questioned by prosecution.

Vijay Singh claims accused killer Max Sica brainwashed his family by acting in a 'goody goody' way

THE father of the murdered Singh siblings accused killer Max Sica of brainwashing his family by acting in a "goody, goody" way and encouraging his youngest daughter to allege he molested her, a court heard today.

In the Supreme Court in Brisbane, Vijay Singh was being cross examined by barrister Sam Di Carlo, for Sica, about an argument at the Singh family home in November 2002, about six months before the alleged murders.

The court has heard Vijay Singh and Sica had a major confrontation after Sica went to the house to accuse Vijay Singh of molesting his daughters and beating his family.

Police were called to the house and Vijay Singh told them Sica had been using his powers to manipulate and brainwash his family.

Vijay Singh told Mr Di Carlo that Sica had been brainwashing his family "right from the start."

Mr Di Carlo asked if Vijay Singh believed Sica had any special powers to brainwash people.

"Trying to show he was very goody, goody while I was away," he said.

Mr Di Carlo asked if Vijay Singh meant things such as taking out the bins for the Singh family.

"You think being nice to them was brainwashing them?" Mr Di Carlo asked.

Vijay Singh replied that he believed Sica had been brainwashing his family and manipulating them.

He said on the night of the altercation Sica had said he came to protect the Singh family but it was another case of Sica trying to manipulate his family.

Sica, 41, had pleaded not guilty to murdering Neelma Singh, 24, Kunal Singh, 18, and Sidhi Singh, 12, at Bridgeman Downs, in Brisbane's north, on April 21, 2003.

Mr Di Carlo also asked Vijay Singh about Sidhi going to the school counsellor and making a complaint about Vijay molesting her.

Vijay Singh said Sica had manipulated Sidhi to make the claims.

"He brainwashed my daughter...it was him it was Max Sica who told her to go to the school counsellor. I am not a child molester.

"Max Sica told my Sidhi that I was having affairs and had to be pushed out of the house," Vijay Singh said.

He said the police had investigated the claims and no charges had been laid.

Earlier, Mr Di Carlo had cross examined Vijay Singh at length about the confrontation when his wie Shirley Singh, and his daugthers Neelma and Sidhi were there, on November 22, 2002.

Mr Di Carlo asked if at any time did Sica try to stop Vijay Singh from calling the police, to which Vijay Singh replied: "No."

Vijay Singh rejected a claim that Sica had not used violence to him.

"He (Sica) held me by my neck...he forced me to sit down and he pinned me with his knee," Vijay Singh said.

Mr Di Carlo said Vijay Singh had made threats to Mr Sica.

"You said wait and see what I can do, you will be surprised...what did you mean by that?" Mr Di Carlo said.

Vijay Singh said he meant he would report the incident to authorities as Sica had no right to come into his house.

He said he kept telling Sica that he (Sica) was on parole and was a criminal who had no right to be there.

Mr Di Carlo asked Vijay Singh about allegations he had tried to force his wife Shirley Singh to have sex with Sica and have a threesome with the Singhs.

"I reject that," Vijay Singh said.

Mr Di Carlo asked was it true that Sica and Shirley Singh had decided to lie and pretend they had sex.

Vijay Singh said it was not true and also denied he had turned against Sica when he found out that Sica had not actually had sex with Shirley Singh.

He also denied he had forced Shirey Singh to have sex with "dozens of other men" while he watched.

"Only on two occasions," Vijay Singh said.

The trial before Justice John Byrne continues.

MAX SICA WAS CALLED TO GO OVER TO THE SINGH HOUSE THE DAY OF THE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN HIMSELF AND MR SINGH.

Sidhi Singh and then Neelma had called and text Max to ask for his help. There are phone records showing this and the text messages that were sent. There are also police records and statements made by all involved. Max did not just rock up to the house, barge in and cause havoc.

On the recording of the whole incident (all of it not just bits and pieces) you can clearly hear Mrs Singh tell Max that he has her permission to be there and that he is there in her favor. You can also hear on that recording Mrs Singh in her own language accusing Mr Singh of inappropriate behaviour towards their first born daughter when she was a child. Max was asked by Mrs Singh, Neelma and Sidhi to accompany them when they went to make the complaint. It was not Max who brainwashed them into going there.

Mr Singh did make threats to Max on that recording and you can clearly hear them. Max says on that recording...Dont worry, im not going to hurt you, what do you think i am like you? Im just going to wait for the cops. Remember that Max did not know that Mr Singh was recording the whole incident.

Mr Singh stated in court that the last time he spoke to his children was on Saturday the 19th of March 2003. He did not speak with them at all on the Easter Sunday. He then said that on the Easter Monday, he was going to send some money to Neelma and had to fax a code to her at the house so she then could use it to go get the money. He says that the fax did not work, that he tried to call Neelma and did not get a reply. I wonder why he did not try to call his other daughter A rchana and ask her to contact her sister and tell her he was trying to fax her so she could go get the money he had sent. Mr Singh had instructed Archana to keep an eye on the other kids while he was away, Archana had stated at committal that she was in constant contact with her siblings and was like their shadow. If she had tried to contact her siblings on the Easter Monday and kept on getting no reply, was she not worried as to why? Did she try to contact her siblings during the day on Tuesday?

Mr Singh today stated in court that for 37yrs he has prayed to his God on Mondays and fasts on that day. He even said he was fasting today and that defence lawyer Sam Di Carlo was insulting his God. He stated that they had many Gods which were the removal of evil in any form or way of life.

In the BHAGVAD GITA (indian bible or holy religious book) it is taught that adultery and fornication if one of the highest forms of sin, let alone between a married couple. Even women are taught to hold on to their virginity until married, hence the tradition of arranged marriages as chosen by the parents.

Mrs Singh herself stated that Mr Singh was not a religious man but only took part on major prays and or occassions.

It doesnt matter what religion you come from or what God you believe in as we are all taught that there is only one God. If my God teaches me that adultery is a sin, i know that i will never have the conscience after having participated in fornication to bow my head and pray for justice for the 3 Singh children...mind you, im not even their parent.

The Singh family when it suits them, uses their religion as an excuse to justify most of their beliefs and actions, on the other hand when things dont go to their liking or reflect the aussie culture, they bend towards the ever modernizing western world and culture.

FOR YOU MAX

Don`t dispair, don`t give up, the day is nearing when the truth will be out. We know who you are and we know what you feel, we pray for you each day as we kneel. You would give your own life to save that of another, you are just that way, it`s not only a cover. Hold on to your faith and keep yourself strong, we know you will be free, it won`t be long. Remember we love you we are always near, hold your head up and never fear. The day is coming don`t dispair, we love you max, we will always be there


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The prosecution are now having their moment, media...well i dont think i need to say a thing. Please do wait for the whole truth with the real facts to be heard. Judgements should be made when one hears both sides of a story.

Legal Aid Grants Funding To Alledged Triple Murderer After A Two And Half Year Battle.

''HE will rule the peoples of the world, with JUSTICE and FAIRNESS''-- Psalms 98:9

Alledged triple murderer, Massiomo (Max) Sica, has been granted funding for his choice of defense counsel by Legal Aid Queensland following a two and a half year battle into this matter.

The 41 year old man was charged with 20 child sex offences in October of 2008, and whilst on being on bail for the matters, was later charged on 30 december 2008 for the triple murder of Neelma Singh 24, Kunal Singh 18, and 12 year old Sidhi Singh whose bodies were discovered in a spa bath on 22/04/03.

Following Massino (Max) Sica's arrest into these matters Miss Kerry Smith Douglas (from Kerry Smith Douglas Solicitors) and Mr Sam Di Carlo (from Gregory Court Chambers) have worked "pro-bono" for Mr Sica, until earlier this year when Mr Di Carlo announced that he was no longer able to work on that basis. The accussed, Max Sica has since been representing himself after constanty refusing to accept LAQ's offer to provide funding on the basis that the matters be kept "in-house".

Mr Di Carlo and Howden Sagger Solicitors sought a review into Sica's funding issues on the grounds that there was conflict of interest between the parties involved, and that the communication levels had broken down to an extent that Mr Sica did not feel confident in LAQ handling the matter inhouse. Despite many applications and appeals from legal law firms for funding on behalf of Mr Sica, Legal Aid Queensland has always strongly stood their grounds on the decision made by them.

However, on Friday 16th September (just 2 days before Massimo Sica's bail application was to be heard in court), at around 4-4:30pm, Howden Sagger Solicitors recieved a call from LAQ stating that they have decided to approve funding for Mr Sica's choice of defense counsel.

Max Sica was due to attempt bail again, after several failed applications in the past, on the grounds that he had not received all the brief of evidence from the Crown and lacked facilities in prison to be able to view the digital and electronic evidence, unable to do research or make phone calls for his defense or speak to witnesses without the prying eyes of corrective services, who have in the past worked with QPS to electonically equip an inmate for information on Mr Sica. There were a number of issues that was to be dealt with in his bail application, including Mr Sica's allegation that another inmate had recently been approached by authorities to make a deal with them and act as an informant into Mr Sica (and two other inmates) matters and that they had given out information to this person about his case.

The main arguement for Max Sica's bail application was that he was self-represented for a triple murder trial which begins on January 31st next year and is likely to last more than 20 weeks.

Max Sica's bail application will not be going ahead now, as LAQ has finally agreed after two and a half years to provide funding for his choice of counsel, hence there being no proper grounds for the application to be heard.

It is likely that Mr Sica will be represented officially by Mr Sam Di Carlo and Howden Sagger Solicitors for the murder trial now.