COMMITTAL HEARING

Max was charged with the murders late last year because he was considered a flight risk and a threat, he was not charged because of any overwhelming evidence. As for the taped conversation between max and singh November 2002, well you can plainly hear that max was called there by the Singh children because they were scared. He did not just rock up at 1am in the morning take Mrs Singh side about an argument she and her husband were having about one of his affairs and start a confrontation with Mr Singh (like one particular paper i read reported). You can clearly hear on the tape Mrs Singh saying to Max "you have my permission to be here, are you going to protect me max" you can also hear max say to Mr Singh "dont worry, im not going to hurt you, what do you think i am like you? im just going to wait for the cops". At one point max says to Mr Singh, "put the weapon down" repeatedly. Mrs Singh is clearly heard making other accusations about her husband in english and in her own language. When this taped conversaton was leaked to media, the heading was Max threatened family. Dont forget, Mr Singh was knowingly taping the conversation and still made numerous threats to Max like, dont worry you`re gonna get it, you dont know what im capable of,you will see etc. Were these threats printed in any paper?
Police was called by both Max and Singh im sure they have proof that Max was called to the residence via his mobile phone and sms messages, and im sure they have statements from the rest of the Singh family too.
It is really astonoshing how A paper could print out sheer and utter untruths when they were there to hear a taped conversation that was played in court of an argument between Mr Singh and Max Sica.
In a case of this magnitude where an innocent man is fighting for his life, how can it be that A newspaper (hearing it with their OWN ears and not any kind of heresay)can print such utter lies? It is truly dumbfounding. Six years on and still we ask ourselves, where is the justice? How is a man suppose to defend himself when the public is continuously been fed complete rubbish based on a trial by media who can destroy a persons character and legally get away with it?
Im not saying that they have to make Max out to be a choir boy, for yes, he has got a criminal record, but just because you havent got a criminal record, it doesnt make you a choir boy either.

ANSWERS TO SOME NEW COMMENTS MADE

THIS IS A COMMENT MADE
I am a bit confused! if max is not guilty and he has been held by the police for so long, how come you haven't been able to prove to the court his alibi? from the press reports it is clear max has been trying to destroy a family...or else how come neelima didn't walk out of the house? and the other kids and the wife?
ANSWER TO THIS COMMENT
First of all police dont know when the children died. There have been statements from his family and other people who were with Max on the two days prior to discovering the kids. As for the final remark you made about ... or else how come Neelma etc, well i just think that doesnt deserve any type of response because it is just so senseless. By the way, the wife is alive and living in the house.

DARONS COMMENT well yours is just a personal attack and just lacking any kind of anything.

NOT TAKING TRIAL SERIOUSLY COMMENT you are very mistaken, but like Daron, you may think as you see fit.

COMMENT MADE
Vijay isn't the one on trial so he has no need to refute anything. I'm not denying or approving anything that he has done but no matter what dirt is dug up from this case it still doesn't change that Max murdered the Singh's. Innocent until proven guilty - i completely support but I know both families and both sides of the story and he will be found guilty - even if his family have to commit pergury to give him an alibi - it still won't be enough to save him. See you in court.
ANSWER TO COMMENT no one in his family would ever commit pergury, whomever you are you said you know both families, so im quite sure that if you did, you would know that. But like i stated, you may also have your opinion, and yes, definitly see you in court.

As for your comment Fred, yes we will see.

COMMENT MADE
I believe in innocent until proven guilty and the principals of that. I'll be honest and say I don't know a lot about this case, and I think it is great that you are supporting Max the way you are. I do have a question though - how can you be so sure of Max's innocence? There are a lot of people out there that would have said the same thing about their family and friends, but, when the truth came out in the end they were guilty! Have you thought about that at all??
ANSWER.... Absolutely... and all i can tell you is that i know he is no murderer because i have no doubt whatsoever. But i can understand your point as you do not know him personally and you are also somewhat influenced by media that does not always print the truth.