BLOW TO CROWN CASE

For five and a half years police have worked on the Singh murders. This operation has been described as the most complex and largest investigation in QLD history.

On Monday 21/04/03 Max went and picked up his two children, (12 and 5 yrs of age) and took them to Mcdonalds for breakfast. They went through the drive through between 7.15-7.30am, before going to Ironbark Gully Park. The police siezed camera surveillence from Mcdonalds, within two days from the inside of the restaurant. At 7.05am a man, woman, girl and boy entered the restaurant. They are the very first customers. The man appears to have black hair and looks similar to Max. The man is wearing shorts, a white t-shirt, sandals and watch on his wrist. The young boy has a healthy built and the young girl has long hair reaching below her shoulders, with a bandana on her head. The police believe that this footage was of Max and his children. "Watch" was a main part of the investigation. I guess they thought what any normal person would do, perhaps Max got rid of the watch or got it repaired because he had DNA, BLOOD OR EVIDENCE of water from the spa bath or any other forensic material in it. They even questioned members of the family about it during the CMC hearing in 2006.

Today, a witness, a mother identified the children on the footage as not hers. Max`s daughter who was five at the time had short, ear length (bob)style hair cut. She never wore a bandana. Her record of interview with police on the 23rd of April 2003 shows her hairstyle. The male in the footage appears fuller (chubbier) than Max. The ex-wife couldnt identify Max or her son on the footage either. It doesnt matter to the police what Max or his family has said in their record of interviews. Even Max`s family knew that the footage was not of Max and the children.

As seen on SBS on (every family`s nightmare) last week, its clear that the qld police has chosen the "normative" method rather than the eliminative. They made up their mind from the word go (22/04/03 when Max`s home was described as a secondary crime scene) that Max was responsible for the murders and spent six years building the case around him. (there is evidence of witnesses including a major witness for the crown case, who is yet to come to build up more circumstantial evidence for the investigation, after Max had been charged for the murders in late 2008). But we must give credit to the QLD police because they did use the eliminative method in the end, only to eliminate everyone else and focus their entire cirumstantial evidence on Max Sica. Amazing how they never found any shred of DNA, BLOOD, or any other form of evidence against Max, despite his items (from the Sica house) being siezed on the early hours of the 23rd of April 03, prior to which Max had spent roughly 18 hours in police custody.

The police even had the chance to corrobrate Max`s items of clothing over the weekend, but never even bothered to ask anybody what Max had been wearing on days prior to the discovery.

Neelma`s ex boyfriend (who also exchanged sms messages between Sunday and Monday morning with Neelma) also said he was in bed between 12 and 630am. Police chose to believe him (and his family) yet claim they used the eliminative system from the start, trying to keep an "open mind". They never showed anybody the vehicle or the photoboard of her ex boyfriend or anyone else as has been done to Max. They never believed Max or his family when they individualy testified (while Max was being interviewed by the police just after the discovery of the bodies) to max being asleep at home. This is despite Max`s brother telling them that he checked on Max that night to discuss something with him and saw that he was in bed asleep.(he did this after he had dropped off a family friend back to her house after she had spent the night with him at the Sica residence) This happened after midnight on the 20th of April 03 `the night the police allege the murders had occured'. There are so many examples that can be given about the crime case that really does not make much sense. Maybe thats why they dont want to tell the defence what their case actually is, ie: what they are alleging occured on the night of the "DEATHS".

On one hand, its a premeditated approach, on the other (a spur of the moment), (a crime of passion) approach. They have circumstantial theories to back both avenues up. Its clear to even a blind person that the police have used a normative approach in this investigation. They dont care if Max is innocent, for them who better than an ex criminal, especially one that was involved in burning down a police station???. They just want their promotion, and to keep a face in front of society. They all seem to have forgotten the pledge they took of honesty and integrity, and the faith that the public have in them for truth and justice.

I guess unless you feel the entire weight of the injustice from these very people in whom you place your trust in, you will never know what it means to feel "EVERY FAMILY`S NIGHTMARE". Please do watch for the sex charges to go to trial as the injustice in that case and the normitive way in which the police formed their crown case against Max will be exposed with CRUTIAL evidence which the police would have known if they ever bothered to ask any members of the family, and really it would have helped the crown in their case as at that time none of the Sica family members knew the details about the allegation.

I bet you anything that when the crowns major witness Mrs Bowman, is called to testify, that at least one member of the media will be present to report on it.

As for us we believe in a higher authority beyond this world, we believe in the one and only true God to whom we pray for justice in this matter for the sakes of Neelma, Kunal, Sidhi and Max.