HOW IRONIC??? -STATEMENT/ARTICLE NUMBER 4 FROM MRS MAX SICA....

CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT OFFER TO WITHDRAW THEIR APPLICATION "TO STOP MAX SICA'S BID TO OVERTURN RULING PREVENTING HIS DAUGHTER VISITING HIM IN JAIL"....

(followed by my post, there is an article published by the newspapers 2 weeks ago titled "PRISON AUTHORITIES SEEK" [to stop.....])

Hebrews:11:1-To have faith is to be sure of the things we hope for. to be certain of the things we cannot see............

The Queensland Corrections Department has made an offer to withdraw their application against a judicial review lodged less than a month ago by Mr and Mrs Massimo (Max) Sica, in an attempt to overturn the ruling made by them preventing their children from visiting him for nearly 3 years in custody.

Crown Law yesterday (Friday 19/08/011) contacted the legal representatives of the Sica family and advised them that their client (Arthur Gorrie Correctional Center and the QLD Deputy Commisioners Office) wanted to revoke the decision they made for Nakiesha Carla Sica not to be able to see her father because:

Firstly-Their client could not remember writing the refusal

And secondly, (unfortunately)

They did not have any reason on file/record whatsoever for the refusal.

(Please refer to the notes and statements of Mrs Shivanjani (Shiv) Sica which shows the letter in relation to this query and the response letter from the authorities clearly stating their reasons for refusal.Records of Mrs Sica making several phone calls and demands for a decision after normal protocols weren't followed can be obtained, mainly via FOI through the INTEL system).

The offer made by Crown Law, on behalf of the QLD Corrections Department is simply:

That each party discontinue the proceedings regarding the judicial review and bear their own costs.

The spokesperson for Crown Law also stated that Mr Sica would then have visitation rights to be able to see his daughter, whilst in custody.

My name is Shivanjani (Shiv) Sica and I am the wife of a triple murder/child sex offender suspect. My husband was charged following a five and a half year investigation into one of the states/country's most infamous murders. The bodies of Neelma, Kunal and Sidhi Singh were discovered on 22/04/03 by Massimo Sica in the presence of his children and niece.

On December 30th 2008, charges were layed against QLD police's main suspect, Massimo Sica, following one of the most complex investigations in QLD'S, if not Australia's history. This was nearly 2 months prior to Mr Sica being arrested with 20 child sex offences and the matter only being investigated for only a month.( Later, as documents revealed, investigations were still ongoing several weeks after my husband was arrested with the 20 child sex offences.)

Since then, the prison authorities have denied 3 (and not one as they have specified) innocent children the right to see their father in custody, in a democratic country such as this where the rights of a person are suppossedly meant to be adhered to, and a person is meant to be assumed guilty until proven innocent by a court of law.

If you refer to the letter addressed to the the director of public prosecutions by the corrective services, you'll see the real reasons, as specified by them, into the refusal. I wonder, how suddenly, they claim that they have no record of anything... is it because they know that they have no case against my husband and I, have always known this, but never met a person/family who'd challenge them every step of the way??? Or is it because they chose to covertly listen to instructions from the QPS and now are covering up for them by taking full responsibility?

http://max-sica.blogspot.com/2011/07/above-on-right-is-letter-max-sica-sent.html

(click on above link, will take you to correspondence regarding refusal of Mr Sica seeing his children etc)

Either way, if they really cared, i might add as a simple human being, that at the very least, the corrections department could have acknowledged my stepson, and stepdaughter (and all other family members under the age of 18) who have all been denied the chance to see Max in custody..for nearly 3 years now........guess it goes to show just how much the right hand knows what the left hand is doing............or is it, as i stated before, ongoing injustice/legal politics/corruption ????

Prison authorities seek to stop Max Sica's bid to overturn ruling preventing his daughter visiting him in jail

• Tony Keim
• From:The Courier-Mail
• August 11, 201111:34AM

MAX Sica: seeking a review of ruling which prevents his daughter from visting him in prison. Source:The Courier-Mail

QUEENSLAND prison authorities have applied to "strike out" accused triple murderer Massimo "Max" Sica's application for a judicial review in a bid to overturn a ruling preventing his five-year-old daughter from visiting him in jail while he awaits trial.

The Brisbane Supreme Court was today told Queensland's Department of Corrective Services and the Arthur Gorrie Correctional Centre had lodged an application to throw out Sica's application.

Sica and his wife, Shivanjani Sica, lodged documents in court two weeks ago seeking a judicial review over a decision by Corrective Services and Arthur Gorrie management preventing jail-house visits by their daughter for almost two-and-a-half years.

The Courier-Mail has learned the move to strike out the application relies on the assertion the Sicas did not request the review within the time required.

Sica's mother Anna became enraged and ranted angrily as she walked from Supreme Court Number 5 moments after the matter was adjourned to a later date.

Sica is accused of killing Neelma Singh, 24, her brother Kunal, 18, and sister Sidhi, 12, more than eight years ago.

The siblings were found dead in a spa at their parents' Bridgeman Downs home on April 22, 2003.

He is also awaiting charges on unrelated sex offences.

Court documents viewed by The Courier-Mai reveal Sica and his wife, who married on December 22, 2008, want their daughter to see the accused killer in a bid to maintain their close father-daughter relationship.

Sica, in an affidavit lodged in court on Monday, said: "I have not been allowed to see my daughter (name withheld) or any of my other children since I was imprisoned on or about December 29 2008."

"When I was jailed I had made numerous verbal requests for access to see my daughter's (sic) and was advised by staff at Arthur Gorrie Correctional Centre (at Wacol, west of Brisbane) that I was unable to as I had been charged with sex offences."

Sica said he had the "full support" of his wife, Shivanjani, and was seeking a judicial review in the wake of legal advice he received in February.

"For the last two years and five months I have been refused access to see my daughter by (corrective services and the Arthur Gorrie officials)," Sica says in his affidavit.

"I have the full support of my wife Shivanjani ... in this matter to see my daughter in order to keep a continuing relationship with my daughter as her father."

A date has yet to be listed for the review.

On April 21, Shivanjani Sica - speaking publicly for the first time since her husband's arrest for the Singh murders - told The Courier-Mail she wanted his trials dealt with promptly.

Mrs Sica, reading from a prepared statement, said: "My husband Massimo (Max) Sica has been in custody ... charged with alleged rape and sex offences involving an underage girl and the triple murder of the Singh siblings."

"He is pleading not guilty on all charges.

"Despite Max being charged with these offences in October 2008 - prior to his arrest for murder - he is yet to face trial for the sex charges."

Mrs Sica said she, on behalf of Max, had instructed lawyers to "do everything" to bring on the trial for the sex offences as soon as possible.

"Max's family and I believe that trial for these sex related offences has been unnecessarily delayed," she said.

Lawyers for Sica earlier this month told a Supreme Court judge they believed police continue to prolong the more than eight-year investigation.

Barrister Sam Di Carlo said he could not longer afford to represent Sica on a pro bono basis - meaning for no fee.

Justice John Byrne said he had real concerns that Sica would now have to represent himself.

Mr Di Carlo complained that it would not be possible for anyone to be ready if the police kept producing new material in the case and "dropping it" on defence lawyers.

"When is the investigation going to stop? It is impossible for us to prepare a trial plan when we keep having new material given to us," Mr Di Carlo said.

Sica's murder trial is likely to begin early next year.

statement by mrs sica COMMON SENSE ARTICLE PART 2

Common Sense-Part 2......

MATHEW:6:6- But when you pray, go to your room, close the door, and
pray to your Father, who sees what you do in private,will reward
you.


I am the wife of Massimo (Max Sica) and my husband has been in
custody since 29th December, 2008. Due to legal resaons and the matter being
before the courts, I (and we as a family) have to be careful of what facts and
evidence we can give out to the general public, as arrests would follow on
charges of "OBSTURCTION OF JUSTICE" ............for speaking out the truth and
proving it with evidence.


I am the "alibi witness" who wrote the article "Common Sense". I have
sat by for many years and watched the LEGAL POLITICS involved in this case,
which is still ongoing.


On or about May 2004 (shortly after my birthday) I agreed to speak to
a police officer who was working with the lead detective and was/is the main
liasion for the Singhs. At the end of the converstaion I asked him a "common
sense" question (after he told me that the queensland police had numerous
evidence to prove that Max was responsible for the murders)- that if they had so
much evidence against him as they proclaimed, why was he not arrested and put
behind bars? To which he (the detective-name with held) stated to me that it was
only a matter of the investigations being completed before an arrest was going
to be made against Massimo Sica, which they proffessed to be in the near
future....


I was only a friend of Max's at the time, but now am his wife.
Following the five and a half year investigation (which is still ongoing) the
QPS charged my husband with the murder of the Singh siblings. This occurred 6
weeks after he was released on supreme court bail after being arrested and
charged with 20 child sex offences. The child sex investigation was only carried
out for a month. At no time did any police officer attempt to speak to any of
the many alibi witnesses involved in the matter, and despite having a doctors
report stating the child in question has an intact hymen (ie
virgin) they charged a triple murder suspect who has and is still going through
"trial by media".

If anyone has common sense they will be able to relate to the human
nature that exists in everyone of us and either/or Godly nature that exits in
us.....

The state has spent more then 20 million dollars over the course of
many years into the investiagtion of the Singh murders, and has come up with a
circumstancial case against Max Sica, who (as proved in court) was the prime
suspect within less then 18 hours of the discovery of the bodies.

Despite claiming that they have used an eliminative system, it is
clearly visible to any expert who looks at the evidence, that the QPS has used
the normative method. This case has never been about justice, but legal
politics.Do you honestly think that the authorites care whether Max is innocent?
I mean who better to blame then an ex-criminal, especially one who was involved
in the arson of a police station 10 years prior.....

The authorites continue to add to the injustice Mr
Sica faces (someone who they claim to be innocent until proven guilty in a court
of law) by trying to completely dehabilitate him and his family.
After being charged with the murders, Legal Aid Queensland, has
refused to fund anyone of Max's choice of defense, and would rather keep the
matter "inhouse" despite this case being described as the most complex and
highest profiled.
The crown recently succeeded in delisting the sex trial date
(originally set for november this year) taking away any chance of Max's
innocence being proven. They prefer to have the sex matter heard after the
murders. Might I add that nearly every lawyer we have consulted, have stated the
same thing, that in the last minute, they will drop the sex charges against Max
as the crown knows they will lose the case and civil lawsuits would follow for
assisination of character and lack of proper police investigation. (As I stated
in coomon sense article part one, a circus will be made of the judical
system.)

Today, my husband has been denied the right to choose a counsel of
his choice, and has no other choice but to represent himself, whilst in custody.
The QPS continues to use petty techniques in order to set Max up. They
have/still work in conjuction with the prison and have wired other inmates in
order to get any type of information on Max Sica. They refuse to give him
unmonitored phone lines and the chance to interview witnesses disceetly. In
other words, they want to know everything Max does and what his defense is going
to be, and it is a common known fact that Max and his family went through years
of surveillance, including listening, covert police operations, gps tracking
device, camera, etc prior to the arrests.
They have succeeded in putting one obstacle after another in our
path.
Our children have been denied their human right to see their father
in custody for nearly 3 years now, due to the sex charges. The authorites, in
response to the Crowns enquiry stated that this decision was made because Max
was a high profile sex offender/ suspect....
My battle with the Arthur Gorrie Coeectional Center and the Deputy
Commisioners Office spanned for nearly an year, despite the normal time
protols(time limits) not being adhered to.After the final refusal, the deputy
commissioner wrote that I could not make any further applications for another 12
months. At no time, even though i asked them what the next step should be for me
to take, did they ever hint of such a thing as a JUDICIAL REVIEW.
In February this year, Mr Chris Nyst from Nyst lawyers advised my
husband that this matter could be easily resolved via a judicial review. An
application for a review was submitted in court recently, and on Thursday, we
came to know that the authorites have put in a bid to have our application for a
review thrown out as according to them THE SICAS DID NOT APPLY WITHIN THE
SPECIFIED TIME FRAME. What about the numerous delays we have faced despite
proper time frames outlined in the legislation?


Do you think the authorites really care about the psychological and
emotional damage this is causing to innocent children? As a mother, I ask you
what do you do when your five yr old pampered daughter says to
you after you tell her that the police will not take kindly to her not having
her seat belt on in the car and she replies to you, "i dont care because at
least i will get to go to jail and there i will get to see my
daddy."

Or when she quietly comes up to you when u getting dressed and
asks if she can come with me to see her daddy? What do you do when you see your
daughter start praying for her dad at the age of 2 and a half with sobs at times
and then asks you why it is taking God so long to let her see her
daddy?
And as a wife you hear from the father of your child that he doesnt
even remember how his children look like anymore....


All we want and pray for is the true and real glory of christ to be
revealed in all this......FOR WHAT IS JUSTICE if it only reaches Max and not the
Singh children? At the end of the day, despite what anyone thinks or believes,
i have tested my husband and i know through christ that true justice will shine
through at the end of this battle which is yet to come.As for the sex case, the
complainant child must be virgin mary to have sex at least once or twice a
fortnight from a tender prepurbescent age of 9, over the course of 4 years
with a fully matured, above average, postpubescent 34 year old male, and still
have a fully intact hymen with no abnormalties whatsoever despite full
penetration occurring constanly, and as described by the complainant child-a
vibrator too.

Father I thank you for being in control of this war, and changing and
moving circumstances behind the scenes and for the glory of Christ out saviour
to be seen in all this. AMEN.

NEWS ARTICLE 12/08/2011

Accused triple murderer will make third bid for bail

Accused murderer Max Sica is set to apply for bail for the third time so he can better prepare to represent himself at his upcoming Supreme Court trial.

The long-awaited trial - at which he is to plead not guilty to murdering girlfriend Neelma Singh and her two younger siblings - is listed to begin in January next year.

Due to Mr Sica's inability to fund his own legal representation and his refusal of taxpayer-funded Legal Aid Queensland lawyers for his trial, Mr Sica is planning on defending himself.

The 40-year-old father of three has been on remand since his arrest in November 2008 and has been denied two previous attempts at release on bail.

The Queensland Court of Appeal has also denied Mr Sica's appeal against a Supreme Court judge's refusal to release him.

But this morning in the Brisbane Supreme Court, his lawyer Sam Di Carlo foreshadowed another bail application based on Mr Sica's problems accessing evidence in his case while in Arthur Gorrie Correctional Centre.

He said Mr Sica requires all the evidence including crime scene photos, witness statements and police allegations against him in order to prepare his own defence.

He said accessing all the documents and files has been made difficult because of the prison rules and lack of facilities at the jail.

Justice John Byrne agreed a bail application "might be an application that is worthy of consideration".

Mr Di Carlo said a 24-hour curfew could be placed on Mr Sica, as well as a condition he wear an ankle bracelet which could monitor his movements.

Mr Sica was brought from jail today and told the court he should be allowed to interview witnesses in his case in an unmonitored interview room in the prison.

He also wanted access to an unmonitored internet connection to send emails and do legal research as well an unmonitored phone line and a printer and a fax to be able to correspond with witnesses in his case.

He said such things would be "my normal legal right" in order to prepare his own defence case.

But Justice Byrne said that was "quite the shopping list" reminded Mr Sica it was his choice to refuse Legal Aid lawyers and his choice to represent himself.

In making that choice there were disadvantages, he said.

Corrective Services representatives informed the court they could address some of Mr Sica's requests, but Mr Di Carlo labelled that "lip service."

"That's what they say, but it's just not so," he said.

Justice Byrne told Mr Di Carlo to put any specific complaints in writing.

Pre-trial argument regarding the murder trial is listed to begin on September 12.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NEWS ARTICLE 11/08/2011 JUDICIAL REVIEW

Accused murderer's mother storms out of court

Amelia Bentley

August 11, 2011 - 11:36AM

The mother of accused triple murderer Max Sica has stormed out of a Brisbane court screaming: "My son is innocent.

This morning, Anna Sica left Brisbane Supreme Court in tears after a court case involving her son was adjourned for the second time.

Mr Sica, accused of killing Singh siblings Neelma, Kunal and Sidhi in April 2003, has been on remand in Arthur Gorrie Correctional Centre since his arrest in late 2008.

He claims he is innocent but has lost several attempts to get bail in the lead up to his trial, listed to begin in January next year in Brisbane Supreme Court.

Since his detainment, he has been prevented from seeing his three children.

However last month his legal team lodged a judicial review of that decision.

Outside court, Mr Sica's barrister Sam Di Carlo said other prisoners including sex offenders in Arthur Gorrie Correctional Centre were able to see their children, but an administrative decision by the jail's manager was made preventing Mr Sica's children from visiting.

He said the judicial review lodged sought reasons for that decision, saying the restriction had damaged the bond between Mr Sica and his children, the youngest being five-years-old.

"If he's found not guilty, they've (jail management) broken the bond that will forever be irreparable to the child," he said.

"This has happened despite him being innocent until proven guilty. It's a joke."

After the judicial review case was adjourned this morning, Mrs Sica yelled out in the court room before storming out.

"My son is innocent, why can he not see his children, I want my son to see his children," she said.

"It's not fair on the babies. He has been in jail almost three years."

"These are allegations against him, the police have proved nothing."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Max Sica`s mother has every right to stand up for her son and have his fundamental rights given to him. Below this post you will find affidavits from both Max and Shiv Sica and their many requests for Max Sica to see his children. In point number 40 of Shivanjani Sica`s affidavit, you will read this.......

40. In the reply from the Acting Deputy Commissioner of Custodial Operations Scott Collins on or about 28 October 2010, I was advised that I could not make any further applications for a period of a further 12 months.

As you can see they did everything they could possibly do. These are ALLEGATIONS made against him that have not yet gone to trial even though they were first made in 2008.

Dont forget that Max Sica was on bail for these sex allegations in November 2008, two months after they decided to charge and arrest him for the Singh murders which were committed in April 2003.

http://max-sica.blogspot.com/2010_04_01_archive.html

click on the link above and you will read a post called COMMON SENSE. There will you find all the true facts that also came out in the committal phases regarding the sex allegations.

Ask yourself why they are trying so hard to stall the sex case from ever going to trial, ask yourself why he would not be permitted to see his children when he is in a correctional facility with many other prisoners who either are accused of or guilty of their crimes and still get to see their children.

Please do read the post COMMON SENSE and see if all this does make sense to you. I am not making this up as i go along, they are all actual facts.