EVEN IF YOU WANT TO BELIEVE MAX SICA IS GUILTY, HE HAS NOT HAD HIS RIGHTS GIVEN TO HIM AT ALL, NOT EVEN GIVEN THE CHANCE FOR AN APPEAL ON ONE OF THE BIGGEST CRIMINAL CASES IN QLD`S HISTORY, WHICH IS BASED MAINLY OR MOSESO ALL ON CIRCUMSTANCIAL EVIDENCE.
PARTIAL BLOODIED EAR AND FACE PRINT FOUND AT THE CRIME SCENE NOT BELONGING TO MAX OR THE SINGH`S, NOT ENOUGH.
WITNESS STATEMENTS STATING TO HAVE HEARD SCREAMS AND LOUD NOISES ON THE MONDAY NIGHT FOLLOWING THROUGH TO EARLY TUESDAY MORNING, NOT ENOUGH.(police say Max killed the Singh`s Sunday night early Monday morning)
STATEMENTS FROM OTHER WITNESS CLAIMING TO HAVE SEEN THE YOUNGEST SINGH CHILD ALIVE ON MONDAY MORNING OUTSIDE HER FRONT DOOR, NOT ENOUGH.
OTHER STATEMENTS MADE BY TWO WOMEN WHO SAW A MAN WALKING NEAR SINGH`S HOUSE ON THE TUESDAY MORNING (DAY BODIES WERE DISCOVERED) AT 530 AM AND NOT FITTING MAX SICA`S DESCRIPTION NOT ENOUGH.(this man upon seeing these two women, quickly turned the other way and jumped a fence.)
JAGA WHO MADE FALSE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST MAX SICA WAS NEVER CHARGED OR FULLY INVESTIGATED FOR WHY HE DID SO.
TAMPERING WITH JURY MEMBERS, NOTHING DONE ABOUT IT.
ANDREA BOWMAN WHO FOR FIVE YEARS BASICALLY SPIED ON MAX SICA FOR POLICE AND SAID HE SORT OF PARTIALLY CONFESSED TO HER, NEVER MADE A RECORDING AND ONLY TOLD THIS TO POLICE TWO WEEKS AFTER HE HAD ALLEGEDLY PARTIALLY CONFESSED. POLICE HAD ASKED HER ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS TO WEAR A WIRE OR HAVE A RECORDING DEVISE WHICH SHE REFUSED TO DO SO. WONDER ITS BECAUSE SHE KNEW SHE WAS FULL OF IT.
JUST ON THESE FEW THINGS MENTIONED ONE WOULD AT LEAST I THINK HAVE REASONABLE DOUBT.
WE ARE NOW GOING TO LODGE IN FOR THE HIGH COURTS APPEAL AND IN THE MEANTIME WE WILL DO WHAT IT TAKES. WE WILL NOT GIVE UP BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT MAX SICA IS INNOCENT AND THAT THIS CASE IS ONE OF THE MOST BIGGEST CASES OF INJUSTICE QLD HAS EVER SEEN. JUDGES ARE ONLY MEN NOT GODS, AND LIKE ANY MAN, EVEN THEY CAN MAKE ERRORS, WILLINGLY OR UNWILLINGLY.
AS FOR MEDIA........LAWS SHOULD BE CHANGED AS TO HOW THEY OPERATE WHEN A PERSON HAS NOT EVEN BEEN CHARGED FOR A CRIME. MAX SICA WAS HOUNDED AND PERSECUTED IN THE MEDIA FOR YEARS WHEN HE WAS NOT EVEN CHARGED WITH THIS CRIME.
WHEN THE SEXUAL ALLEGATIONS CASE WENT PUBLIC, MEDIA HAD A FIELD DAY AND DID NOT EVEN WAIT TO AT LEAST SEE WHAT THE CASE WAS REALLY ALL ABOUT. IN MY OPINION, THE SEXUAL ALLEGATION CASE WAS THE WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY POLICE WERE LOOKING FOR AS TO ARREST MAX SICA FOR THE SINGH MURDERS. THEY HAD NOTHING NEW, NO NEW EVIDENCE, NO MIRACLE WITNESS AND NO SMOKING GUN. JUST A MASSIVE SMEAR CAMPAIGN ON HIM. ONLY TWO MONTHS AFTER THE SEXUAL ALLEGATION CASE TOOK PLACE IN 2008, HE WAS CHARGED AND ARRESTED FOR THE SINGH MURDERS.
THIS IS NOT THE END AND IT WONT BE TILL THE REAL TRUTH BE TOLD AND MAX SICA RELEASED FOR A CRIME HE DID NOT COMMIT.
