MAX SICA DENIED BAIL YET AGAIN

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/singh-dad-had-motive-in-childrens-murders-court-20091214-kr2z.html

Today Max Sica was once again unjustly denied bail. The Judge who was originally appointed for the bail hearing was changed at the last moment and Judge Douglas (who volunteered his services) was once again the bail Judge for Max Sica. Once again Max was denied bail because of unfounded assumptions of him fleeing, reoffending or tampering with witnesses. What i heard in court today had nothing to do with the actual murder case, but all to do with Max Sica`s past and an arson attack (on police station) which was committed many years ago. Max Sica has done more than his fair share of time in jail for charges laid against him in 1990.

If Max Sica wanted to flee, he would have. Max Sica was a completely free man in 2006 and could have even travelled overseas if he chose to. When Max Sica was to be married, (December 2008) he actually asked the priest if it could be done as soon as possible because he knew that he was going to be arrested. If he had any intention to flee, why didnt he?
Max Sica has been under close police surveillance practically since the murders occured in April 2003. The house where he lived with his parents was bugged, he was followed and observed by police constantly and other tactics by police were used to further their investigation and try to obtain any other information. (like using undercover officers to befriend Max Sica and try to get any evidence against him. which they did without any outcome)

Max Sica has never interfered with police investigations and has always been fully cooperative with them. He has never been violent towards anyone or threatened anyone in anyway.
Even the states own forensic experts have stated that there is not one scintilla of evidence against Max Sica. No DNA no fingerprints and no transference between Max Sica, the murder weapon and the Singh children. All the scientists agree about the transference theory which states that when two objects come into close proximity of eachother, mollecules would bind from the two objects. When the states forensic expert was asked if this was the case for Sica, he stated there was nothing on Max Sica`s person, clothes, shoes, motorvehicles or Sica`s home, not even a microdot of evidence.
Common sense would prevail that not one person alone could have killed the Singh children and that in the brutal way that they were murdered, would leave DNA and blood spatter on the person/s who had killed them.

We believe that Mr Singh was under federal investigation prior to the murders, why are there no documents to at least state why was this done and what was the outcome?

Max Sica has been made out to be some kind of violent murdering monster with nothing in his background to make one believe so. In court at the committal hearing, there has been a lot said about violence, beatings, sordid sex lives etc etc which had nothing at all to do with Max Sica.

There were at least 6 fingerprints found around one of the victims heads which did not belong to Max Sica and only one of these prints was sent overseas to Fiji because police said they did not have the funding. More than 52 unidentifed prints were found at the Singh residence.

Justice Douglas again denied Sica bail because he said that there was no material change in his circumstances that warranted his release. Which material changes did he want? The case is a very weak one even he admitted this. It was also said that there were at least another 6 persons who could have committed the crime even more so than Max Sica and that police did not really investigate it to the full. It was also heard in court today that there was a statement made by Mrs Singh to the police that she blamed her husband for the death of their children.

Judge Douglas even agreeing to certain things still refused bail for Max Sica mostly because of assumptions of him being a flight risk, of reoffending or of tampering with witnesses, or worse still some corruption at a judicial level.

We have 100% proof of this occurring already at a magistrate level with a female magistrate which did not uphold the law. Judges are not meant to make popular decisions but they have a duty to uphold to the letter of the law and not just be a puppet of the state (which is occurring at this time in QLD and has been for at least a couple of decades).
Should Queensland`s bail system change to a more common sense approach..... the Judge presiding at the committal hearings should also be appointed to the bail hearings, for only he is in the position to know the strengths or weaknesses of a case. (especially on a case of this magnitude)

This is a great miscarriage of Justice and the QLD criminal justice system needs to have an overall cleaning and change of their current system.
Max Sica has delcared his innocence from the very beginning but he was already targeted as a prime suspect within not even 24 hrs of discovering the bodies.
Max Sica was always there when the family was in trouble because he was called to be there and helped them in anyway, especially because of the violence Mr Singh infilicted on his family.

In most murder cases there is somehow a strong motive as to why one would do such a thing, in Max Sica`s case there is no motive whatsoever.
In the last five days prior to the murders, police own records indicate that Max Sica and Neelma Singh were getting along very very very well.

I hope the state government shows the same stamina and vigour to pay a multimillion dollar compensation claim to Mr Sica and his family for the nearly seven years of persecution. Also ask yourselves..... why has Det. zitny not been charged with perjury when it clearly came out in court recently he perjured himself? The best advice that we have within the government so far, tells us that he has not been charged because it would open a floodgate of convicted people to ask to be retried and this would cost the state millions. BUT what price do we place on justice? The state must bear the cost once it employs a corrupt force just like anyother company would be liable for their employees actions.