Thursday, May 6, 2010

INVESTIGATOR CREEPED OUT BY SICA

Investigator 'creeped out' by Sica AMELIA BENTLEY
May 5, 2010 - 6:18AM

Accused killer Max Sica allegedly held his victim's hand as she lay dead in a spa bath, a Brisbane court has heard.

In the continuation of a committal hearing for Mr Sica, accused of the brutal slaying of his on-and-off girlfriend Neelma, 24, her 18-year-old brother Kunal and 12-year-sister Sidhi Singh seven years ago, Brisbane Magistrates Court yesterday heard evidence from a private investigator involved in the murder inquiry.

Brenda Sanche, who met with Mr Sica several times after the suburban killings, told detectives investigating the murders she became "creeped out" by Mr Sica who she believed was "obsessed" with the exact time of the Singhs' deaths and why their bodies were dumped in a hot spa bath.

Sica case in turmoil as lawyer demands cash
Sica 'forced into small socks'

Ms Sanche, who was not present in court but whose evidence was played via a recorded interview with police, said Mr Sica told her how he discovered the bodies of the Singhs when he let himself in to their home through an open garage door in April 2003.

He told her how, after seeing the bodies in the spa, he had held Neelma's hand before emergency services arrived at the crime scene in Grass Tree Close, Bridgeman Downs, in Brisbane's north.

Ms Sanche said she found that piece of information "really weird" and said she "thought he was lying" about parts of his story after she studied his body language.

After having coffee with Mr Sica several times in the months following the killings, Ms Sanche said she was "creeped out".

"I was feeling kinda creeped out about Max. Just things he said ... every conversation we had he wanted to know the time of death ... he was obsessed with the time of death," she said.

Mr Sica also was fixated on the security system installed at the Singhs' home, telling Ms Sanche the system had "laser beams" which could detect people in the home.

He also continually spoke about how the bodies had been left in hot water, saying: "Everybody knows it's cold water that gets rid of evidence".

But Ms Sanche said she did not think Mr Sica believed that statement, saying she thought he would have known it was hot water rather than cold which could wash away evidence.

Ms Sanche said an associate named Greg had told her Mr Sica had "looked into my eyes and said he didn't do this" and Greg believed him.

"He's telling me to believe him, but things just didn't make sense in my head," she said.

Following a five-and-a-half-year investigation into the Singh murders, Mr Sica was arrested and charged the murders of the Singh siblings.

The 40-year-old father of three from Stafford Heights, in Brisbane's north, denies the charges.

Since his arrest in November 2008 and following two failed applications for bail, Mr Sica has been in jail on remand awaiting the outcome of a trial.

The committal hearing, in which Magistrate Brian Hine will determine if there is enough evidence for the case to proceed to trial, continues today.


OBSESSED WITH SINGH`S TIME OF DEATH AND WHY BODIES WERE DUMPED IN HOT SPA BATH.... Max Sica was devestated at finding Neelma, Kunal and Sidhi dead in a spa. He as much as anyone wanted to know who did this. The police when interviewing him the first time had asked him who he thought had done it, he replied how would i know, but if i did, pray i dont get to them first. He then told the investigating officer i did not do this if that`s what your thinking. Then he soon came to realize that he was their prime suspect.

As for Ms Sanche, the so called investigator, she was on her first job when she met Max and was an understudy for the actual real investigator, Greg, the person she says was an associate. Ms Sanche at that stage had no qualifications whatsoever to be an investigator let alone analysing someones body language. But like everything else about this case, each and all are entitled to have their say about what they assume, what they allege and what they then acutally know.

5 comments:

  1. OMG that woman cannot be serious... Creepy..? I find it creepy that The Singhs still live in the house where their children were killed... Creepy is not a basis for a case...

    ReplyDelete
  2. The comment was made to describe a gut feeling or reaction to a person or circumstances, not to base a case on. Before you judge the Singh's for remaining in the house, think about how you would feel if you lost your children. Perhaps there is solice in staying in the home.

    ReplyDelete
  3. All are entitled to their opinion and no one said that the Singh`s should or should not stay in that house. Everyone is different and what one person may find creepy, another may not see it that way at all. This goes for both the Singh`s and for Sica. There are people who know the Singh`s others who know Sica some who know both and then others that don`t know anyone at all. Everyone of these people will all have an opinion, but in the end a case is not based on opinions.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was undecided until I read the bit about him being in the house. Noone goes into someone else's house uninvited. What, noone answers when you knock so you creep in an open garage door? That is hell creepy. Yeah, he did it. No question.

    ReplyDelete
  5. To whoever wrote this comment,might i remind you (but then again you would only know if you attended the committal hearings)that Mrs Shirley Singh herself informed the police that a number of items was missing from the house example... Neelma`s jewellery, items of sentimental value to Mrs Singh from her children, etc, INCLUDING SIDHI`S HOUSE KEY WHICH WAS KEPT IN SIGHI`S BLACK PURSE AND IN HER SCHOOL BAG.
    This site was set up to write facts that come out in court. Unless you have personally being to the committal hearing yourselves, i dont think anyone should give their "view" on how they view things on this matter. Might i remind you that you dont have to take my word for it, just go check the actual court transcripts (if you cant attend everyday to keep up)to see the validity of the information provided on this site

    ReplyDelete