statement by mrs sica COMMON SENSE ARTICLE PART 2

Common Sense-Part 2......

MATHEW:6:6- But when you pray, go to your room, close the door, and
pray to your Father, who sees what you do in private,will reward
you.


I am the wife of Massimo (Max Sica) and my husband has been in
custody since 29th December, 2008. Due to legal resaons and the matter being
before the courts, I (and we as a family) have to be careful of what facts and
evidence we can give out to the general public, as arrests would follow on
charges of "OBSTURCTION OF JUSTICE" ............for speaking out the truth and
proving it with evidence.


I am the "alibi witness" who wrote the article "Common Sense". I have
sat by for many years and watched the LEGAL POLITICS involved in this case,
which is still ongoing.


On or about May 2004 (shortly after my birthday) I agreed to speak to
a police officer who was working with the lead detective and was/is the main
liasion for the Singhs. At the end of the converstaion I asked him a "common
sense" question (after he told me that the queensland police had numerous
evidence to prove that Max was responsible for the murders)- that if they had so
much evidence against him as they proclaimed, why was he not arrested and put
behind bars? To which he (the detective-name with held) stated to me that it was
only a matter of the investigations being completed before an arrest was going
to be made against Massimo Sica, which they proffessed to be in the near
future....


I was only a friend of Max's at the time, but now am his wife.
Following the five and a half year investigation (which is still ongoing) the
QPS charged my husband with the murder of the Singh siblings. This occurred 6
weeks after he was released on supreme court bail after being arrested and
charged with 20 child sex offences. The child sex investigation was only carried
out for a month. At no time did any police officer attempt to speak to any of
the many alibi witnesses involved in the matter, and despite having a doctors
report stating the child in question has an intact hymen (ie
virgin) they charged a triple murder suspect who has and is still going through
"trial by media".

If anyone has common sense they will be able to relate to the human
nature that exists in everyone of us and either/or Godly nature that exits in
us.....

The state has spent more then 20 million dollars over the course of
many years into the investiagtion of the Singh murders, and has come up with a
circumstancial case against Max Sica, who (as proved in court) was the prime
suspect within less then 18 hours of the discovery of the bodies.

Despite claiming that they have used an eliminative system, it is
clearly visible to any expert who looks at the evidence, that the QPS has used
the normative method. This case has never been about justice, but legal
politics.Do you honestly think that the authorites care whether Max is innocent?
I mean who better to blame then an ex-criminal, especially one who was involved
in the arson of a police station 10 years prior.....

The authorites continue to add to the injustice Mr
Sica faces (someone who they claim to be innocent until proven guilty in a court
of law) by trying to completely dehabilitate him and his family.
After being charged with the murders, Legal Aid Queensland, has
refused to fund anyone of Max's choice of defense, and would rather keep the
matter "inhouse" despite this case being described as the most complex and
highest profiled.
The crown recently succeeded in delisting the sex trial date
(originally set for november this year) taking away any chance of Max's
innocence being proven. They prefer to have the sex matter heard after the
murders. Might I add that nearly every lawyer we have consulted, have stated the
same thing, that in the last minute, they will drop the sex charges against Max
as the crown knows they will lose the case and civil lawsuits would follow for
assisination of character and lack of proper police investigation. (As I stated
in coomon sense article part one, a circus will be made of the judical
system.)

Today, my husband has been denied the right to choose a counsel of
his choice, and has no other choice but to represent himself, whilst in custody.
The QPS continues to use petty techniques in order to set Max up. They
have/still work in conjuction with the prison and have wired other inmates in
order to get any type of information on Max Sica. They refuse to give him
unmonitored phone lines and the chance to interview witnesses disceetly. In
other words, they want to know everything Max does and what his defense is going
to be, and it is a common known fact that Max and his family went through years
of surveillance, including listening, covert police operations, gps tracking
device, camera, etc prior to the arrests.
They have succeeded in putting one obstacle after another in our
path.
Our children have been denied their human right to see their father
in custody for nearly 3 years now, due to the sex charges. The authorites, in
response to the Crowns enquiry stated that this decision was made because Max
was a high profile sex offender/ suspect....
My battle with the Arthur Gorrie Coeectional Center and the Deputy
Commisioners Office spanned for nearly an year, despite the normal time
protols(time limits) not being adhered to.After the final refusal, the deputy
commissioner wrote that I could not make any further applications for another 12
months. At no time, even though i asked them what the next step should be for me
to take, did they ever hint of such a thing as a JUDICIAL REVIEW.
In February this year, Mr Chris Nyst from Nyst lawyers advised my
husband that this matter could be easily resolved via a judicial review. An
application for a review was submitted in court recently, and on Thursday, we
came to know that the authorites have put in a bid to have our application for a
review thrown out as according to them THE SICAS DID NOT APPLY WITHIN THE
SPECIFIED TIME FRAME. What about the numerous delays we have faced despite
proper time frames outlined in the legislation?


Do you think the authorites really care about the psychological and
emotional damage this is causing to innocent children? As a mother, I ask you
what do you do when your five yr old pampered daughter says to
you after you tell her that the police will not take kindly to her not having
her seat belt on in the car and she replies to you, "i dont care because at
least i will get to go to jail and there i will get to see my
daddy."

Or when she quietly comes up to you when u getting dressed and
asks if she can come with me to see her daddy? What do you do when you see your
daughter start praying for her dad at the age of 2 and a half with sobs at times
and then asks you why it is taking God so long to let her see her
daddy?
And as a wife you hear from the father of your child that he doesnt
even remember how his children look like anymore....


All we want and pray for is the true and real glory of christ to be
revealed in all this......FOR WHAT IS JUSTICE if it only reaches Max and not the
Singh children? At the end of the day, despite what anyone thinks or believes,
i have tested my husband and i know through christ that true justice will shine
through at the end of this battle which is yet to come.As for the sex case, the
complainant child must be virgin mary to have sex at least once or twice a
fortnight from a tender prepurbescent age of 9, over the course of 4 years
with a fully matured, above average, postpubescent 34 year old male, and still
have a fully intact hymen with no abnormalties whatsoever despite full
penetration occurring constanly, and as described by the complainant child-a
vibrator too.

Father I thank you for being in control of this war, and changing and
moving circumstances behind the scenes and for the glory of Christ out saviour
to be seen in all this. AMEN.