On the day max sica discovered the bodies, he was with his son , his daughter and his niece. (aged from 5 to 11 yrs of age) He had passed by with the kids to see if they (the singh children) wanted to go to the movies. He had tried to call the house and on mobile but kept on getting no answer. When he arrived, he noticed that the cars were in the garage and a side door leading into garage was unlocked. He thought this odd as no one inside answered the phones. Upon opening the door, the singh`s childrens dog leaped at him and shook. He then proceeded to enter the home, and in doing so, discovered the horrendous scene. He must have been in utter shock.
On that same day, police took him in for questioning (18 hours of it) He was examined to see if he had any markings on him (defence wounds from victims etc) none were found. He did not think of going in with a lawyer because he had nothing to hide and did not consider himself to be a suspect in any way.
The police were saying to media at beginning that he was a witness BUT they would say this only when faced with media. The truth is that they had already targeted him and considered him a suspect from beginning. The day Max Sica was taken through the singh home (his father present with him) all the police kept on saying to him was come on, tell us who you killed first, we know you did it etc etc. Max sica was seen on news coming out of there nearly collapsing. I can just imagine what it would be like to have witnessed a scene like he did, then have to return to it while police at same time are accusing you of it.
Max Sica was called on quite a few occasions to go to the singh residence by the mother Mrs Singh or one of the singh children for support in certain matters.
Max sica was brought up on newspaper articles even for a traffic violation. When he was brought up for driving without registration and insurance, well to begin with, the car belonged to a family member, who forgot to update both things. It has happened to me personally and im sure if it had happened to me to be pulled over by police and not realizing it be fined, im sure i would`nt be on the news over it.
I was at the bail hearing on friday 2 january. All i can say is that the public does not know the full extent of what was actually said on that recording between Mr singh and Max Sica. The only thing i clearly understood is that Max Sica was there on the request of Mr Singh`s wife.
On that recording Mrs Singh was making accusations against her husband (in very graphic details) about what he had done to her, and her children. (including bashings of her children and sexual molestation) Max sica was in no way there to threaten the parents of the singh children.
As for the judge repremanding Max`s lawyer about not making certain comments to media about trumpt up charges, trial by media etc etc Well what about all the media coverage on Max Sica? Did anyone in authority try to stop the media when they hounded him and his family? Did police ever step up and at least write some wrongs that had been stated? Max Sica is having basically a Trial by Media. No new evidence was put forward at the hearing, Mr Carlo Sica never told his son to flee the country, and has always cooperated with police in every way shape and form as his son Max Sica has done.
This case has been going on for nearly six years. Max Sica has been under scrutiny from police since the beginning. Is this a case of tunnel vision? Is the police under so much pressure to solve this case that putting away an innocent man is the answer? I ask where is the justice? Too much justice can sometimes be a great injustice.
Is this what the police say they have for charging Max Sica with the triple murders? They charged him because they consider him a FLIGHT RISK? And of top of that they allege it was a taped conversation in 2006? In 2006 this man could have gone wherever he wanted to go, he was a FREE MAN. His was not on parole, he was not charged with anything, so i dont see the significance to begin with.
I am also sure that they only presented part of a conversation on that taping. I am sure when the whole converstion is heard, it wont sound like they wanted to portray it at all.
From the beginning this man has given police everything, dna, clothing, cars, footprints, earprints, his whole body was examined and photographed to see if he had any kind of markings on it (scratches, bruises defence wounds from victims) he did`nt even have a scratch.
At the beginning, i remember that they didnt even acknowlegde that he was neelma`s boyfriend, it was stated that he was infatuated with her, stalking her etc etc. Now i see the papers are regarding him as the ex-boyfriend.
Max Sica had always protected those kids, and their mother from the violence of their father, MR SINGH. I dont see police investigating and scrutinizing him. It also seems to me that the media is suffering from partial deafness and blindness, since they do not report what they truly hear, see and read.
This is one of the greatest injustices ever. Seems more like a circus to me than anything else. If this would`nt be so serious and devastating, it would be commical.
Shortly after Max discovered the bodies, he went to chermside shopping centre. While there he passed by a shop where Kunal`s girlfriend worked. He waved to her and she incredulously stated that the wave was a threat to her and security was called.
Police also arrived and unbenounced there was the media too. The media was there in a flash, ready to hound him just that bit more and slowly but surely start a character assassination campain. (in my opinion, hand in hand with police)
This man has had and has constant surveilence on him since discovering the bodies. If he passed gas (fart) they knew about it. What kind of life is this?
As for the flight risk aspect, well if i was hounded to that extent day in day out, if my family was put under a microscope along with me, if i had to walk around with a big question mark over my head and people whispering things when i walked past, i think i would have had about enough and even welcomed a trial to prove my INNOCENCE and CLEAR MY NAME.
As you can all see this man has never moved from where he was. He has never fled even if he could have done so when he was a completely free man and was in his right to go even to the ends of the earth. This man has a family, he has 3 children and a wife. He has always stated his innoncene from the very first day.
Now for the arsonist issue...... In 1990 when max sica and about another 5 or 6 guys were charged, they were all charged for the same thing, its only that max sica got the longest sentence, makes me wonder why. Yes a police station was burnt down, dont know who lit the match, but i agree that if youre with the people that do it, youre just as guilty and i also agree that he Max Sica, had to be punished along with the others. Not only was he punished, but he spent the most time in jail.
His lawyer at that time told him to accept a plea bargain, Max Sica wanted to plead guilty to the things he had done and not to other charges that he didnt even know existed or participated in. His lawyer also convinced his parents that it was the only option to take even though he knew his client was right. He said just take the plea bargain thats just how the system works, if you dont take the plea bargain, it will be against your best interests. Well in the end his parents (who believed in what their sons lawyer was telling them) and his lawyer convinced him that it was the only way to go. As soon as he took the plea bargain and pleaded guilty the judge gave him the longest sentence. The others didnt even get half that.
This man has paid well and truly for crimes he commited many years ago. May i add that in that what they call CRIME SPREE, he didnt go kill anyone, or cause bodily harm to anyone.
Yes this man does have a criminal past, but does not mean that it automatically makes him a TRIPLE MURDERER. to be continued.........
I believe this blog was created to provide the public with more insight to the case. Rather than relying on the police or media to release relevant and pertinent key factors which would certainly make any person question as to why this man is on trial, family and friends have decided enough is enough. Other blogs regarding Max have been created by ill informed, non processing small minded people. I don't see why we should be subjected to those blogs and not counter re act with one that instead of being a blog with senseless comments and no substance is one with some very true and interesting facts.
ReplyDeleteYour concern is commendable however I don't believe this is in anyway harmful to Max. It was created by somebody close that cares for him and the sole purpose is to allow the public to know more of the case. These facts the media has been armed with however through editing and being selective in what they are releasing have condemned this man from day one. We as the public who have been bombarded with this case for over five years have a right to know ALL the facts.
gdw
ReplyDeletewho ever made the comment Rot in Hell,,well may it come back to u 10 fold,,how dare u...
ReplyDeleteWell well well,, it is amazing to see how non intelligent people make such childish comments,,may you rot in hell..
ReplyDeleteFor someone who does not know the family nor Max himself whom i have to say we all love very dearly..
We are all behind you Max and we are all waiting for your safe trip back home,,,where you so belong
I for one am glad this blog has come about. Its good for everyone to be able to get a better understanding of this case. As to the person who said "may you rot in hell", you obviously have your IQ in single digits. May you one day be suspected of murder, hounded by press and have people make horrible childish comments like that about you.. maybe then you will learn that nothing is as straightforward as it seems and it is better to use wise judgment and rational thinking rather that talk through your arse.
ReplyDeleteIt does not take a genius to put all the media articles existing for this case to clearly see that there has been no evidence to prove that this man is guilty.. sure ha has a criminal pass but that does not mean he is guilty for EVERY crime that has ever been committed.
Don't get me wrong, if he IS guilty may he be punished for it and if he IS NOT guilty then may he be free and left alone. My issue here is with justice in what is apparently a fair and just society.
The media and the police have obviously judged Max guilty. The media reports throughout this case have been very one sided and bias. The tape recordings and Mr Singh's past dealings with the police in regards to the protection order taking out against him by his wife Shirley, as well as the assault charges against Mr Singh when he bashed his daughter with a pool que were obviously known to police.. So why was the public not told about it all earlier? Why focus so much attention on one man when the police obviously knew about all this? We have read reports concerning Max for matters like driving in an unregistered car while amazing news regarding the parents of the Singh children left unpublished?
Is it fair to allow the public such a one sided account of this case? Will he end up getting a fair trial when judge and jury would obviously be 'brainwash' like the rest of the public? If this is allowed to happen to one person should the rest of us not be afraid that one day anyone of us or our loved ones may end up being charged for a crime we know we did not commit? INNOCENT BEFORE PROVEN GUILTY... NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND!
oh my goodness daron that is a shocking comment - brazen and completely emotionally - hope you are feeling tougher for it - he may be charged but he's innocent until proven guilty - I have only just start reading about this case and I have to say it completely doesn't add up, hence I've come to this website to find out Max Sica's side. The media in Brisbane and Australia is completely appalling and sensational. Well done for Max's friends and family to post a website with their factual side of the story. I wondered if Mr Singh would do the same in order to balance scales. You'd think that if he was completely righteous and a honourable husband and father then he'd counteract the media reporting about his fidelities, abuse, dodgy business dealings, threats by him and to him that seems to permeate through the media
ReplyDeleteTHE TRUTH ALWAYS COMES OUT IN THE END. I JUST HOPE IN THE MEANTIME DOESN"T DESTROY ANOTHER LIFE
Vijay isn't the one on trial so he has no need to refute anything. I'm not denying or approving anything that he has done but no matter what dirt is dug up from this case it still doesn't change that Max murdered the Singh's. Innocent until proven guilty - i completely support but I know both families and both sides of the story and he will be found guilty - even if his family have to commit pergury to give him an alibi - it still won't be enough to save him. See you in court.
ReplyDeleteMax's apprehension at the scene and subsequent questioning sound like routine procedure. The idea that the police have singled him out for hounding because of some personal vendetta... They obviously believe he is guilty. They always question the closest person/people to the victim first, and usually they are right. They have years of experience and have seen the same thing and heard the same excuses over and over.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all no one said that Max was hounded out because of some kind of personal vendetta...there is no personal vendetta to be had. That they obviously believe he is guilty does not mean he acutally is, i suggest you read up on some major cases that have oome out recently about how obviously guilty they thought those people were and then found out to be totally innocent, some because of botch up jobs, forensic failures or just corruption at its highest level. In one case they said tyre impressions matched, blood found in vehicle which could match victim found, accused had time, place and possible motive for crime. Based on these so called facts the accused was tried and found guilty and sent off to jail, nearly 15 yrs later it was discovered that the tyre prints never matched, the so called blood was rust spots and the accused did not have the time or motive to commit such a crime. This person was finally let out of jail and no re trial was ever motioned because the person is actually innocent and could not have committed the crime. This is one but astounding case of true injustice at its worst. Just because you say the police believe he is guilty is just exactly that, A BELIEF, one which some may have. What you need to convict a person is proof, proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Logically not based on fabricated, unfounded or just plain wrong evidence like in some cases. Im sure there are some people who are truly guilty of the crimes they commit, im sure police hear many excuses over and over again, but remember that at the cost of having your beliefs and hearing things over and over again, you cant risk putting a truly innocent person in jail for some hideous crime they did not commit. I can have beliefs, thoughts, or notions about things and people...does it mean that just because I have these BELIEFS etc i must always be right and never make a mistake because its MY BELIEF? I dont think so.
ReplyDelete