ANSWERS OR MORE QUESTIONS?

The committal continues and more questions arise than answers. Why did police not investigate other areas of interest that were put forward to them? Example: One male was seen by two persons (who were taking a walk at 5 30 am Tuesday morning 22nd of April 2003) jumping a fence and disappearing, two cars were seen at the Singh residence at around 9 am the same morning by a neighbour. On Monday night at around 8 30 pm neighbours heard a loud horrible scream coming from around the area of the Singh`s home. An xtra large shirt was found at the Singh home and did not belong to anyone in the family or Max. Why did it take police 6 days to say they had discovered bleached footprint on the stairs and then wait one year to take Max`s footprints? The mother of the Singh children took a bloodied pillow from the crime scene and if it wasnt for her daughter Archana to say so, no one would have known it was missing. At this point i ask, was it only this item to go missing from the crime scene? Three days after discovering the bodies, Max was taken through the house and Det. Zitny said that he thought Max faked the grief he was feeling, Was Max already the prime suspect from the very beginning? Is this the reason why police did not further investigate the above mentioned leads? Neelma`s vehicle was fully inspected by forensics and shortly after it was sold by Mrs Singh to one of Neelma`s friends. He had cleaned the car thoroughly at least twice after he had bought it. On one occassion he had given Mrs Singh a lift and two days after had found a watch and other items belonging to Neelma in the car that had previously been reported missing by the Singh family. There are also issues involving drugs been taken and sold which have been heard at the hearing. These things have been stated at the committal but i have yet to read them in any newspaper report. I do not want to sound biast or one sided, but even if i did not know Max or anything at all about this case and as a simple person, i would be questioning this all the same.
I want justice for the Singh children just as much as anyone else or even more so as i know Max did not do this. I knew those three kids, i knew Neelma, Kunal and Sidhi, they are not just three names to me they are three human beings that did not deserve to have their lives end as it did and i truly hope and pray that the real culprit/s be caught so that they(the singh children)can truly have peace and Max can truly have his name cleared and innocence proven once and for all.
AND HOW ABOUT THE SO CALLED FOOTPRINT EVIDENCE...............
It's been six years in the making and the opening days of the committal hearing for the man accused of one of Brisbane's most shocking crimes had all the elements: sex scandals, violence, forbidden love and murder.
But the case of Max Sica has taken a decidedly pedestrian turn today.
A podiatrist has testified she cannot exclude the possibility a footprint left at the scene of the Singh siblings' murders belonged to the man accused of killing them.
Doctor Sara Jones told the Brisbane Magistrates Court she analysed footprint impressions made by Sica, 39, and footprints found at the Bridgeman Downs home where 24 year old Neelma, her 18-year-old brother Kunal, and 12-year-old sister Sidhi Singh, were killed in April 2003.
Sica, of Stafford, is charged with their murders.
The hearing last week heard Sica had been dating Neelma but the relationship ended when her father Vijay Singh forbade the two to see each other.
Dr Jones said it was possible a footprint on carpet at the house belonged to Sica.
She examined Sica's feet and had him make footprint impressions on paper at Petrie Police Station, she said.
"I was unable to find any characteristics that would exclude him (as a match)," she said.
(((((But under cross-examination by Mr Sica's lawyer, Dr Jones accepted hundreds of people's feet could also match the footprint at the scene.)))))
During an explosive two days of evidence last week, Mr Singh admitted beating Neelma with a pool cue, conducting extra-marital affairs and clashing with Sica over the older man's designs on his daughter.
He also accused Sica of trying to push him out of the family by making false accusations of sexual abuse against his youngest daughter, Sidhi Singh, and was quizzed by Sica's lawyers about his own role in his children's deaths.
Mr Singh is due to continue his evidence later today before his wife Shirley takes the stand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AS STATED BY DR SARA JONES HERSELF IN AN ARTICLE...
“I was part of a team investigating a murder,” she said. “The person who actually committed the murder carried the body and dumped it in a swamp.
“We could prove the body was carried out, and did not return, because of the distance between the steps and the depth of the footprints going out through the mud varied considerably to those coming back. The evidence helped to convict the person.
“However, all podiatry evidence is circumstantial. The only definitive and absolute evidence is finger print evidence. Even DNA is still considered circumstantial, but when you add the information with other facts, it helps.

note: Both Dr Jones and Canadian Expert Robert Kennedy also stated that they could not even say when the fooprint was actually left at the scene. It could have been left before or even after. Plus like i have stated in this blog, police allege they found the so called footprint 6 days after the bodies were discovered, yet they took Max Sica`s footprints one year later in 2004. They made him wear all kinds of socks, thick, medium, thin and socks that were small for his feet too. They had his footprints since he voluntarily gave them over five years ago.
Also i would like to point out that the age gap between Max and Neelma is 8 yrs not 8decades. I did not see anyone be offended at the age of Mr Singh`s niece or other women he frequented. I only point this out because they always comment on the age difference but really, i do not see the significance.