MAN SEEN JUMPING FENCE

Ms Foster (woman who had heard blood curdling screams coming from Singh house area at around 8.30pm on Easter Monday night 2003) had gone for her usual walk with then neighbour Olive at around 5.30am on Tuesday the 22nd of April 2003 (day Singh children bodies found) and had seen a man approaching them, all of a sudden this man ran the other way towards the Singh house and jumped a neighbours fence. Ms Foster had given an indenticate photo of this man who she says was between 40 to 50 years old, thin build and baldish. This was given to police days after murders occurred.

I ask only this, why was the indenticate photo of this man not ever published in any newspaper or put on any t.v. news program? Was this not a very crutial lead? Who was this man? Why was he around the Singh house area that early in the morning and particularly on that day? Why did this man run and jump a fence when he spotted the two women coming towards him? Why did this man not come forward and say who he was if he had nothing to be afraid of? It really is unbelievable that practically nothing was done about it.

Mr Paul Sarri who has stated seeing Sidhi Singh on Easter Monday morning, also said that when he gave his statement to police, they kept on telling him that he must be mistaken, that it must have been on another day. Mr Sarri was adamant he had seen her then.

Another man had initally stated he had seen Neelma Singh arrive at her house in her silver car on the Easter Monday morning, he had noticed this because he said that her car was the same as his friends car, only that his friends car was red. He said he had been working at the area for about seven days. He had given his statement to police the following day after the bodies were discovered (Wednesday 23rd April 2003) A week later he said he had made an error and changed his statement, he said it was not the Easter Monday but the week prior. When he gave his evidence in court, he was visibly shaking and seemed somewhat disoriented. About five to ten minutes into questioning, defence barrister Di Carlo and Magistrate Brian Hine asked if he needed a break, he said he did. To me this mans behaviour seemed somewhat strange, but then again it might have been only my impression.

Too many unanswered questions and a lot of things popping up that were not mentioned from the start. Why? Makes one think and wonder.

Max Sica lawyer bid to delay hearing until 2010
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26087755-3102,00.html
As far as i know, it was the prosecution who had initially asked for and adjournment because the court space was needed. But at this point and looking at how this committal is progressing, an adjournment is unavoidable because of witheld material. Police are still after six years giving new crucial material to defence. Truly inappropriate when in the pursuit of JUSTICE, not only for the Singh`s, but also for Max Sica himself. You would think that after a period of over six years, the police would have had ample time to have ALL material for the defence, unbelievably not even the head of the investigation then (Brian Paton who retired 2-3 years after murders occurred) has yet to give his statement. The defence is expected to instead recieve crucial documentation on the spot and deal with it then and there.

Max Sica is the one who is recieving further injustice from all of this because he is the one still being kept in confinement.