Because under QLD`S justice system you are not allowed to enter evidence that is not chief evidence... in other words, since the prosecution did not call the witnesses to give evidence, max`s lawyer was not allowed to....... otherwise there were no less than five convicted drug dealers who had put forward statements about Mr Singh`s alleged drug dealings and double crossing the Asians he was dealing with. Apparently he lied and said he had not recieved the drugs in the shipping container and when the truth was found out, this could have been a cause of retaliation and motive for the murders.
Mr Singh only declared $17.000 taxable yearly income. YET...he had three motor vehicles, four properties and flew back and forth from Australia to Fiji. Where did the money come from for this?
There are many witnesses that could not be called.
Today in court, they stated that max`s son could not recall picking up his auntie, they could have called upon the statements of the other two children in the vehicle to corroborate this fact, but max`s lawyer was not allowed to call upon those statements.... yet the prosecution could have, but chose not to, because it did not suit their case or agenda.
PLEASE NOTE....
Under QLD law, i must state most of the above (and in certain parts of this blog) is alleged and can only be fact once the documents and or witnesses are produced in court. And in this case, only the prosecution can request them....God forbid they should do the right thing......
links to sex case ....all proven with documentation and in court.
I am horrified to find out that Qld justice system doesn't allow the Defense to call their own witnesses and produce their own evidence!! That is not a fair trial. How can this been changed - other State allow the defense to submit their case.
ReplyDelete