To all concerned

.Firstly, Max Sica asked for an judge only trial (due to all the media hype concerning this case,) then he requested the trial be heard in another state where it would be fairer (as most other states allow the defence to call witnesses and enter evidence, and where the media coverage was not all one sided). These requests were denied.

Now after the state has spent $23 million on this circus; the judge wants to give a massive summing up to the jury. ARE THEY FOR REAL? WHAT A JOKE! NO WONDER THEY GET CONVICTIONS WRONG SO MANY TIMES .

POINTS TO CONSIDER

· THE PAINTER (WHICH THE DPP DID NOT CALL TO THE STAND) WAS 110% SURE OF SEEING THE LITTLE GIRL COME OUT TO GET HER DOG MONDAY MORNING. NOTED IN WORK DIARY.

· THE GIRL WHO WENT TO KNOCK ON THE DOOR AND HEARD LOUD MUSIC ON MONDAY AFTERNOON, NO ONE CAME TO DOOR BUT THE MUSIC WAS TURNED OFF.

· THE NEIGBOURS (9 IN TOTAL) THAT HEARD THE BLOOD GURLDING SCREAMS ON THE MONDAY NIGHT JUST AFTER MIDNIGHT COMING FROM THE SINGH HOUSE, AGAIN THE DPP DID NOT CALL THEM TO THE STAND.

· THE POLICE PSYCHIC THAT TOLD POLICE MAX DID NOT DO IT AND THAT IT WAS TWO GUYS; A SMALL ASIAN GUY AND A BIG TALL INDONESIAN LOOKING MAN, AND GUESS WHAT? AT THE CRIME SCENE THEY FOUND A XXXL WHITE T-SHIRT AND SIZE 8 SANDLES WITH BLOOD ON THEM, WHY DID THEY NOT CALL HER TO THE STAND?

· THE FACT THE FATHER HAD SEX WITH A YOUNG GIRL, THEN BRIBED THE FAMILY WITH $500 AND A FEW GIFTS.

· THE FACT THAT ONLY THE 3 CHILDREN THAT MR SINGH WAS HAVING PROBLEMS WITH WERE KILLED AND NOT HIS FAVOURED CHILD. AT THE MOST CONVENIENT TIME WHEN THE POLICE WERE LOOKING INTO HIM MOLESTING HIS YOUNGEST, AND IT WAS ON TAPE THAT HE SAYS TO HIS WIFE “YOU KNOW I LIKE IT.”.

· THE LADY THAT SAW TWO MEN APPROX 5AM TUESDAY, JUMP THE FENCE BEHIND THE SINGH HOUSE. WHY NOT CALL HER TO THE STAND?

· THE FACT THAT MR SINGH SAYS TO MAX (AND ITS RECORDED BY HIMSELF) “YOU WAIT, YOU WILL GO THROUGH YOUR WORST NIGHTMARE SOON AND REMEMBER IT WAS ME AND I WILL BE LOOKING DOWN AND LAUGHING”, ”YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT IS COMING AND WHAT I AM CAPABLE OF” CHILLING WHEN YOU CONSIDER THEIR CULTURE KILLS THEIR OWN CHILDREN FOR SILLY REASONS ALL THE TIME AND HE TELLS THEM THEY ARE DEAD TO HIM.

THERE ARE MANY MORE WITNESSES THEY COULD HAVE CALLED BUT DID NOT. (SO AS NOT TO SHOW THE TRUE CASE; ) THE FACT MR SINGH WAS UNDER FEDRAL POLICE INVESTIGATION..... I HAVE BEEN MADE AWARE THEY WILL CONTINUE WITH THIS INVESTIGATION AFTER THE CASE WITH MAX IS DEALT WITH (HOW UNFAIR).

The following statements i must advise for legal reasons are all alleged and some like the end scenario is an intelligent thought plausable account of what may have been the sorry last days,for the Singh children.

You may recall mr singh was bashed in another home invasion a few years prior,just too many questions when it comes to this dispicable person

· THE ''ALLEGATIONS'' THAT THE FATHER (MR SINGH) STOLE A DRUM OF DRUGS FROM HIS BUSINESS DEALING WITH ASIAN GANGS AND LIED THAT IT NEVER ARRIVED IN HIS SPARE PARTS CONTAINER THAT CAME FROM INDONESIA. IT WAS NOTED THE VALUE OF THESE DRUGS WERE $350,000 TO $400,000 THIS WAS FURTHER CONFIRMED BY A FINANCIAL ADVISOR WHO WAS INVITED TO THE SINGH HOUSE AND ASKED HOW MR SINGH COULD CLEAN AND UTILISE SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS OF CASH. THIS MAN DISAPPEARED AND HAS NEVER BEEN FOUND.

IT IS OUR BELIEF THAT THE KILLERS ENTERED THE HOUSE SUNDAY NIGHT; MADE THE CHILDREN SEND OUT SMS MESSAGES TO THEIR FRIENDS TO NOT COME OVER, THEN KEPT THE CHILDREN ALIVE NOT WANTING TO KILL THEM, TRYING TO GET MR SINGH TO PAY BACK THE MONEY HE SOLD THEIR DRUGS FOR. WHEN MR SINGH DID NOT RESPOND OR REFUSE TO GIVE THEM THEIR MONEY BACK, THEY KILLED THEM THEN CLEANED UP AND LEFT TUESDAY MORNING.

ANOTHER KEY FACT IS MR SINGH HAD TO SELL A PROPERTY OVERSEAS AND THE MONEY WAS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR; SO HE PAID THE KILLERS BACK ONLY AFTER THEY KILLED HIS 3 CHILDREN AND THREATENED TO KILL HIM OR HIS OTHER CHILDREN TOO. WHAT MAN WOULD LEAVE HIS CHILDREN TO FACE THE MESS HE CAUSED?

THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES